Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:03:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:02:51 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:11597 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:02:39 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.0test11-ac1 To: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl (Maciej W. Rozycki) Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:31:13 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), johannes@erdfelt.com (Johannes Erdfelt), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "Maciej W. Rozycki" at Nov 21, 2000 07:25:30 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > > o Dont crash on boot with a dual cpu board holding a non intel cpu > > > Is this the patch to check for the Local APIC? > > Yep > > Hmm, that's weird -- the check is already there for some time -- see > verify_local_APIC(). It works and it's reliable even for the 82489DX. Its completely unsafe. The CPU in question is NOT intel. It has no APIC instead you poke around randomly in MMIO space and the box dies. You have to check the cpu capabilities too Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/