Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-11137-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2023 10:03:12 -0800
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] lib/group_cpus: simplify grp_spread_init_one()
 for more
Message-ID: <ZYnD4Bp8R9oIz19s@yury-ThinkPad>
References: <20231212042108.682072-1-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <20231212042108.682072-8-yury.norov@gmail.com>
 <ZXkDhBqtLAg054ub@fedora>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZXkDhBqtLAg054ub@fedora>

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 09:06:12AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 08:21:07PM -0800, Yury Norov wrote:
> > The outer and inner loops of grp_spread_init_one() do the same thing -
> > move a bit from nmsk to irqmsk.
> > 
> > The inner loop iterates the sibling group, which includes the CPU picked
> > by outer loop. And it means that we can drop the part that moves the bit
> > in the outer loop.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  lib/group_cpus.c | 8 +-------
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/lib/group_cpus.c b/lib/group_cpus.c
> > index 664a56171a1b..7aa7a6289355 100644
> > --- a/lib/group_cpus.c
> > +++ b/lib/group_cpus.c
> > @@ -18,14 +18,8 @@ static void grp_spread_init_one(struct cpumask *irqmsk, struct cpumask *nmsk,
> >  	int cpu, sibl;
> >  
> >  	for_each_cpu(cpu, nmsk) {
> > -		__cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, nmsk);
> > -		__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, irqmsk);
> > -		if (cpus_per_grp-- == 0)
> > -			return;
> > -
> > -		/* If the cpu has siblings, use them first */
> >  		siblmsk = topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
> > -		sibl = cpu + 1;
> > +		sibl = cpu;
> >  
> >  		for_each_cpu_and_from(sibl, siblmsk, nmsk) {
> >  			__cpumask_clear_cpu(sibl, nmsk);
> 
> Correctness of the above change requires that 'cpu' has to be included
> into topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu), however, not sure it is always true,
> see the following comment in Documentation/arch/x86/topology.rst
> 
> `
>   - topology_sibling_cpumask():
> 
>     The cpumask contains all online threads in the core to which a thread
>     belongs.
> `

It's kind of nontrivial to spread IRQs on offline CPUs, but
technically the above seems correct. I'll drop the patch then.