Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757589AbXLJVAZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:00:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751746AbXLJVAO (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:00:14 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:50871 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751485AbXLJVAN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:00:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:59:23 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: rjw@sisk.pl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 Message-Id: <20071210125923.37bd2f10.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071210204212.GA5502@elte.hu> References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071210204212.GA5502@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1715 Lines: 37 On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 21:42:12 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Subject : jiffies counter leaps in 2.6.24-rc3 > > Submitter : Stefano Brivio > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/24/53 > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9475 > > Handled-By : Ingo Molnar > > Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/7/132 > > Linus, Andrew, i need some help deciding what to do about this > regression. The fixes for this have been tested and resolve the > regression, but they change printk and other code that runs by default > and is thus rather invasive so late in the v2.6.24 cycle. This bug > should only affect CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y kernels (a non-default debug > option) - although some claimed effect was on udelay()/mdelay() too. > > i've attached below the queue of 5 patches that fix this problem. They > have been build and boot tested with more than 1000 random kernels in > the past few days, so i certainly trust the core and x86 bits of this. > > what do you think? Right now i've got them queued up for 2.6.25 in both > the scheduler-devel and the x86-devel git trees - but can submit them > for 2.6.24 if it's better if we did them there. I've got no strong > opinion either way. printk_clock() doesn't seem terribly important but what's this stuff about effects on udelay/mdelay? That can be serious if they're getting shortened. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/