Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-12564-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:25:08 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] firmware/psci: Set
 pm_set_resume/suspend_via_firmware() for SYSTEM_SUSPEND
Message-ID: <20231228102508.dyyrfxkd7lssweoj@bogus>
References: <20231227-topic-psci_fw_sus-v1-0-6910add70bf3@linaro.org>
 <20231227-topic-psci_fw_sus-v1-1-6910add70bf3@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231227-topic-psci_fw_sus-v1-1-6910add70bf3@linaro.org>

On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 11:15:30PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Some device drivers are curious to know whether "the firmware" (which is
> often assumed to be ACPI) takes care of suspending or resuming the
> platform. Set the flag that reports this behavior if SYSTEM_SUSPEND is
> implemented.
>

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep