Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:46:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:46:20 -0500 Received: from nta-monitor.demon.co.uk ([212.229.78.70]:25097 "EHLO mercury.nta-monitor.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 12:45:39 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011228173505.00aa3da0@192.168.124.1> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:44:10 +0000 To: Petri Kaukasoina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Roy Hills Subject: Re: zImage not supported for 2.2.20? In-Reply-To: <20011228163250.A31791@elektroni.ee.tut.fi> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011228124704.00abba70@192.168.124.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20011228101818.00aaa2c0@192.168.124.1> <4.3.2.7.2.20011228101818.00aaa2c0@192.168.124.1> <20011228121228.GA9920@emma1.emma.line.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20011228124704.00abba70@192.168.124.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 16:32 28/12/01 +0200, Petri Kaukasoina wrote: >Hi, I used to make zImages, but for no specific reason. The last working >version was 2.2.20pre3. 2.2.20pre5 gave Out of memory -- System halted. I >reported it a few months ago: >http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0108.2/0363.html > >This was the only change then that looks like it: > >o Add support for the 2.4 boot extensions to 2.2 (H Peter Anvin) So it looks like this is a real issue, and it's been tracked down to somewhere between 2.2.20pre3 and 2.2.20pre5. Unfortunately, I need to use zImage on my Tecra. I know that zImage is old, and I've heard that support for it will eventually be withdrawn, but I don't really have much alternative right now unless there is a patch which works around the Tecra's buggy A20 handling. Does anyone know the status of zImage format in modern kernels? Is it _supposed_ to be supported under 2.2.recent? How about 2.4.recent? I guess that, if zImage is supposed to be supported, then I have a genuine bug. However, if zImage support has officially been dropped, then it's a different matter - in this case, the only bug would be that the Makefile should issue a sensible message when you try to "make zImage" rather than producing a kernel that won't work. Regards, Roy Hills -- Roy Hills Tel: +44 1634 721855 NTA Monitor Ltd FAX: +44 1634 721844 14 Ashford House, Beaufort Court, Medway City Estate, Email: Roy.Hills@nta-monitor.com Rochester, Kent ME2 4FA, UK WWW: http://www.nta-monitor.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/