Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-14211-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Sender: Ingo Molnar <mingo.kernel.org@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:51:33 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'peterz@infradead.org'" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"'longman@redhat.com'" <longman@redhat.com>,
	"'mingo@redhat.com'" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"'will@kernel.org'" <will@kernel.org>,
	"'boqun.feng@gmail.com'" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	'Linus Torvalds' <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org'" <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	'Zeng Heng' <zengheng4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 1/5] locking/osq_lock: Defer clearing
 node->locked until the slow osq_lock() path.
Message-ID: <ZZPcpVJVfsPk06xk@gmail.com>
References: <2b4e8a5816a742d2bd23fdbaa8498e80@AcuMS.aculab.com>
 <714ca2e587cf4cd485ae04e5afb8d5bb@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <714ca2e587cf4cd485ae04e5afb8d5bb@AcuMS.aculab.com>


Also, please don't put periods into titles:

 s/[PATCH next v2 1/5] locking/osq_lock: Defer clearing node->locked until the slow osq_lock() path.
  /[PATCH next v2 1/5] locking/osq_lock: Defer clearing node->locked until the slow osq_lock() path

Usually maintainers remove them manually, but there's no reason to be 
inconsistent: half of your series had a period. It just unnecessarily 
distracts from review.

This rule applies to this series and to all future patches.

Thanks,

	Ingo