Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b995:b0:f9:9502:5bb8 with SMTP id it21csp6546414rdb; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 05:42:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGcGM/5eAQpn1C3HDuJbiTlNENwKT6YAia8hUtXjKFQyhykYRncm3eltvIhZoxFJo6Db3zw X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:73da:b0:a27:e6c8:7f19 with SMTP id n26-20020a17090673da00b00a27e6c87f19mr1704151ejl.50.1704202976344; Tue, 02 Jan 2024 05:42:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704202976; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=RLzhdiVN6oE+4j/PRDYQQtNA6mMC5jARaeOv5i9eW5geX57zlJKz3CuJLEufuL1FRm M4cyqjclrlJXD7bhbaGoftpkcvqiA5235i/SUtfvCwEyA7zLmKiQKp3rF/DdHpDNkJ6T LgOb2gejhG7yMfxWrxF9cjELPe6/aT9YyNLjvG7BufEBs3deEgyHZNkJH4GlVGNJOqSB 6k5XTd2eaiGoPvB4lFUFjlCYKJALmRFqwoKBjq6d2Wr5VS5225yLVRSo6rf9FE6N8G+G C4sKaPSKRxpb07dK3FZNAfafblr/G3UEL35L9DpvwlOpuWmWilPokCMiJpTTisyR/1sA unhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=LWCClYTN7LBeK0PusKpnQqMjb5jHrk9FTl9arezJve0=; fh=kOdQCiG1VA5ZdOkm38fjO+veTFD/j5SazJPaPy1nlgk=; b=ki5rC4DN7vnh5F4nECMldiaRhh9hqeMeLcN3NknU9R4eMU4O3nkR34OndmD8m8U6Sb oC7s3sajxJmP6vdOR6SWhew4mYD4ilfh0hh4YnEBEAMhwNYW1aYH9pydBv858OhGOFUo aHFtDptX8UCMnFRJ2Z0LrZwtIyPceCKmy5qB0MxMEhCbs4bNzu8ty7VPi7DG9B4Giip8 OOfJhMfQn24V8+EZCSRGfhfj0/QAOFJUMlwbgHzslumtcpRyIiiEfMg8Z//JX0ngRbDi graMFMuyuB8EMH/+fB+VjWoN2l+tdJUN1Cn/s7SUDLpQmZEDCF74QQ2Ml2GDrpe4RpKJ frIA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="Nwco2/gy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-14431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-14431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id wh12-20020a170906fd0c00b00a235a0716b8si7551112ejb.879.2024.01.02.05.42.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Jan 2024 05:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-14431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b="Nwco2/gy"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-14431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-14431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B20D1F22B77 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881DB10A0C; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:42:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Nwco2/gy" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C5910940; Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704202954; x=1735738954; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jr7YmTDiLZWk/2Zs/oXAKicCT/PTbL1zJJ4Y1ag3Ud8=; b=Nwco2/gy5ACrKxy00HSjQrf2a8M4CW0a23dJ5aRmnNddeqro2INk71LO Hu5o6lv2UpxSkI/vaKKiBjcWDwmAeRVAJ0hU+xfnGJqRUOXJcqF2mWfn8 s2NextVbX5krSF9r+qMHClNHp2XQRo30CJqlYijO9qnG2pKiBLJT29pFk BXjU/uYHHar2A3wubVGM+kAfcrRfiFgqBeCliTsvxlHV0/P7odXPvCWMM Y6sLq4yabDoyj4l7x+Cj8jXYm8lSvtDBW+HaIm12T5vDz3vxCHTJwWwS8 m//hPcr1eYD8jDCuyyPBQbfG7SyYj5lDtZajx9BIoVv5Gj1kVYwtxfTjc g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10941"; a="4217818" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,325,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="4217818" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jan 2024 05:42:33 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10941"; a="870265559" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,325,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="870265559" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.237.72.75]) ([10.237.72.75]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jan 2024 05:42:30 -0800 Message-ID: <8169d773-f9ec-4092-b036-9e4fd59966c3@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:42:30 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: i2c-designware: NULL ptr at RIP: 0010:regmap_read+0x12/0x70 To: Borislav Petkov , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Mario Limonciello , narasimhan.v@amd.com References: <20231229120820.GCZY62tM7z4v2XmOAZ@fat_crate.local> Content-Language: en-US From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: <20231229120820.GCZY62tM7z4v2XmOAZ@fat_crate.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi On 12/29/23 14:08, Borislav Petkov wrote: > Looking at the call stack, I see > > 2409205acd3c ("i2c: designware: fix __i2c_dw_disable() in case master is holding SCL low") > > which does that dev->map deref in __i2c_dw_disable() but maybe ->map is > invalid by then...? > > Just a stab in the dark anyway... > Do you run same tests on vanilla? I.e. do you see this on v6.7-rc8? I'm curious to know is this already existing issue or regression because of recent cleanup patches in linux-next between v6.7-rc8.. drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-*.