Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756087AbXLKSjw (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:39:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751805AbXLKSjn (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:39:43 -0500 Received: from el-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.162.180]:22908 "EHLO el-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751661AbXLKSjm (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:39:42 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NSJaWrU/WCsxIoOoQ5MG2bt+EVX7q34Fb45NXC+/rF3mDhPVKr3R7PHfIdsjUT4BBNyE/mKfy7u2QWByXtMYv8/1BNjoqBaUIkKd9AQCCMyNByBb2FqQg0ZSAsLQpNoyDy0rCMJnfj0jGgbwcuVwaq16puhWeBKbBrlix6aLvvM= Message-ID: <7b69d1470712111039j6206decboe8d4df866933de0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:39:40 -0600 From: "Scott Preece" To: "Mauricio Mauad Menegaz Filho" Subject: Re: HTC TyTN || (P4550) violates GPL?? Or maybe Qualcomm itself with MSM7200??? Cc: "Pavel Machek" , CIJOML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200712080115.05608.cijoml@volny.cz> <20071209130813.GE4381@ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1188 Lines: 32 On Dec 11, 2007 11:02 AM, Mauricio Mauad Menegaz Filho wrote: > > Did phone packaging contain sources or written offer for them? If not, > > they are probably still violating GPL. gpl-violations.org, I'd say. > > Hi Michal/Pavel > > Both of you are right. Qualcomm is not offering source codes for the drivers (at > least, there is no way to find the drivers on their site, and they > are probably not > asking for MSM based devices to advertise *drivers available* or such), nor the > iguana source code contains the drivers. Licenses are needless until violated. > > Mauad If the drivers are on the L4 side, they would have no obligation to provide them. That's one of the reasons device manufacturers look at virtualized/micro-kernel architectures. Of course, if the device has Linux in it, they would still need to provide the sources for that, either in the product or via a written offer. scott -- scott preece -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/