Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754914AbXLKVaL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:30:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752568AbXLKV3z (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:29:55 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:35443 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751848AbXLKV3x (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:29:53 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,154,1196668800"; d="scan'208";a="293840364" Message-ID: <475F00A2.6020406@intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: Martin Bligh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <33307c790712110813h23def95dvd068b7226e9fcd36@mail.gmail.com> <20071211123705.844aac24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071211123705.844aac24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2007 21:27:32.0163 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3AA9930:01C83C3C] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1300 Lines: 36 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" wrote: > >>> >>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved >>> over >>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set >>> CONFIG_E1000E. >>> >>> >> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on, rather >> than screwing >> everybody for no good reason (plus breaking all the automated testing, etc >> etc)? >> Much though I love random refactoring, it is fairly painful to just keep >> changing the >> names of things. > > (cc netdev and Auke) > > Yes, that would be very sensible. CONFIG_E1000E should default to whatever > CONFIG_E1000 was set to. which is "y" for x86 and friends, ppc, arm and ia64 through 'defconfig'. the Kconfig files do not have defaults in them. I can send a patch to adjust the defconfig files, would that be OK? I certainly think that would be reasonable, I dislike setting defaults through defconfig for network drivers myself and rather would not do that. Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/