Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754086AbXLKWCR (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:02:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751563AbXLKWB7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:01:59 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([143.182.124.21]:5141 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751273AbXLKWB6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:01:58 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,154,1196668800"; d="scan'208";a="338796125" Message-ID: <475F084E.3090309@intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:59:42 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kok, Auke" CC: Andrew Morton , Martin Bligh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Whitcroft , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <33307c790712110813h23def95dvd068b7226e9fcd36@mail.gmail.com> <20071211123705.844aac24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <475F00A2.6020406@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <475F00A2.6020406@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2007 22:00:16.0530 (UTC) FILETIME=[36853720:01C83C41] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1408 Lines: 37 Kok, Auke wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" wrote: >> >>>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved >>>> over >>>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set >>>> CONFIG_E1000E. >>>> >>>> >>> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on, rather >>> than screwing >>> everybody for no good reason (plus breaking all the automated testing, etc >>> etc)? >>> Much though I love random refactoring, it is fairly painful to just keep >>> changing the >>> names of things. >> (cc netdev and Auke) >> >> Yes, that would be very sensible. CONFIG_E1000E should default to whatever >> CONFIG_E1000 was set to. > > which is "y" for x86 and friends, ppc, arm and ia64 through 'defconfig'. the > Kconfig files do not have defaults in them. > > I can send a patch to adjust the defconfig files, would that be OK? I certainly > think that would be reasonable, I dislike setting defaults through defconfig for > network drivers myself and rather would not do that. that should read "dislike setting defaults through Kconfig ..." Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/