Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b995:b0:f9:9502:5bb8 with SMTP id it21csp7038829rdb; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 02:27:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE+L6lGF8CBj7JqdpIZQ6pmbIWeNkecFvkBykB0+nfxkXc1cGZBCYV0B4qUdDktNB5CUNB8 X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1095:b0:28b:f153:b677 with SMTP id gj21-20020a17090b109500b0028bf153b677mr1029995pjb.23.1704277670702; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:27:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704277670; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NLegFjmRU9DWvQyVs+Jegr0lVFfCAaj5X4BsuivXVn3Q32EdiN8EKLridsGavDMa6x D6rvh1wQp8JhLaT547q/7OeoffPV5SdF5wKCqs1m2QR3SsTPtUzBGrGCLo9QmEl9Qc6P WGy7bsMCP7cgdWFOFY5XdhhezIzLTlsdkP5/AoEKmj2nZAgBe+L1+2vsO54KH5+ICEPt hiNf15nBwNtJiaOsfDekpiq4Zqfh9N+sHObgNALaD6JZJaduhLozGjuTNCar0XbXD+P4 qake/+2YR8JLlsPpmJLrIonIc5Wu4FgI2ZkDZ3vGAxqlZcz/XtJ5qFrbUMeg0pHrmF91 tyBw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe :list-id:precedence; bh=Hpaaqw2etLR/hs22+qj7E5K5Xi3iMRhAz4MlAOEhsmk=; fh=PZM1WIItqKlM8Rg8/vXhm87z5mKZz3H5nuWyQoJhtj8=; b=RTowtVUoVdKyAwbsNG28tGJJQx+buWGqDheqcYuYjmT/m5JwtxzThNmMd2WRf/wixg 6/CWqBOft+ATF56xNDcqyxHoRjBnbe7H328OpRRBQjn4b5gC7qTs3g6uus9dgNEVW+hq a5G/Xt6zItJ1/j3jUiSWEijnwg0tdCEp7arGojO8Qa4XpBkzvON0kcX5Yqe4L0YE2VT7 iQHWAVaaYE28UvSfCrRv1qDYxbsqCCLAVPwoqKcLbKRDVyPE3jY4DmPAdqRS8QQ3EiXL zi3/e1L08WBT6lR2m4BP2vx68W4MbGKKie2rYkvZ8DgZ0c3rdQ8slUVL3rq6RkjrYCdO 7ldw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-15388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from sy.mirrors.kernel.org (sy.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.48.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fs24-20020a17090af29800b0028c2cdaca2fsi954132pjb.16.2024.01.03.02.27.50 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-15388-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sy.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29FF2B22E0F for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:27:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BD218C19; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:26:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-oo1-f47.google.com (mail-oo1-f47.google.com [209.85.161.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A954918C01; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 10:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-oo1-f47.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-593f182f263so2312966eaf.0; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:26:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704277592; x=1704882392; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Hpaaqw2etLR/hs22+qj7E5K5Xi3iMRhAz4MlAOEhsmk=; b=RM6bWWYcqIUHKbmDNvPp6ykIUO99qbg/CvYHORSwJ8Ra5rjeSs3DXb9pTvDnMF28Ah zO14VR6NcdwJe+faoD2Qf6rwaXESZvKhOJgsy9MM/xfOb5ZO2HOrupOCmEIwDQipBtje trgWepeoUsB0l04bDbW22m6inEeKLDM1cD9RZWF+WzLFh2X204X2baiUsW3XvROnS+I2 nqpND/xhl9uprajVn97xJe2auXdsGvW7GmfxYYRnzAPuEWs6xeAFYavML+Z5xwCe1to5 slmnR7uZTCoLlNre+bc1t4mrjgCJbsZWWw4e67SkHkKlIVsq+y6YtSP8WqJmna7i3bzK vZtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzh9eLlldMAZhEoxj0KZW/YKJUKHNCo0JIF4dPOo8pw9B++CgbH Hd8ou3X/VB7yxX0fmuG4iSXX0x43opsSJYmEc6yphWZL X-Received: by 2002:a4a:ea4b:0:b0:595:fcca:e203 with SMTP id j11-20020a4aea4b000000b00595fccae203mr1588816ooe.0.1704277592793; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 02:26:32 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4556052.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher> <3c9f9a53-958e-4d6c-8fe1-6514f97fe1e0@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <3c9f9a53-958e-4d6c-8fe1-6514f97fe1e0@linaro.org> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:26:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused code To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux PM , Srinivas Pandruvada , Zhang Rui , Linux ACPI , LKML , Lukasz Luba Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daniel, On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 10:54=E2=80=AFAM Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > > Hi Rafael, > > On 02/01/2024 14:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02=E2=80=AFPM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat mor= e > >> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from > >> the thermal netlink library. > >> > >> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details. > > > > No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I > > would like to get it into 6.8. > > > > Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic. > > I did not have time to review them properly and I'm OoO until next week. > Is it possible to wait for the next time so I can review them ? I can defer them a few days of course, but if Lukasz can review them in the meantime, I think that should be sufficient?