Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15431-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <062556a9-bf24-4f92-9c37-1723984c5127@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:14:18 +0000
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/6] thermal: netlink: Redefine the API and drop unused
 code
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
 Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
 Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <4556052.LvFx2qVVIh@kreacher>
 <CAJZ5v0hRGKjwDv0VLw550CLfUuNGaVXxmvcpbFhS=PCPqY0n4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <b670b0bc-79ea-4be7-a78d-644b344be408@arm.com>
 <CAJZ5v0jcaa8S7g+kKCC9yHHW-7BN0TLWZecOhdNMpHWYFExgHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0jcaa8S7g+kKCC9yHHW-7BN0TLWZecOhdNMpHWYFExgHw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit


On 1/3/24 10:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi Lukasz,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:10 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> On 1/2/24 13:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 9:02 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> This patch series redefines the thermal netlink API to be somewhat more
>>>> convenient to use on the caller side and drops some unused code from
>>>> the thermal netlink library.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer to the individual patch changelogs for details.
>>>
>>> No feedback, so this series doesn't appear to be controversial, and I
>>> would like to get it into 6.8.
>>>
>>> Tentatively queuing it up and please let me know if it is problematic.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> I agree, these are not controversial patches, so IMO queuing them is OK.
>> I took a glance at them, but I can do the proper review today if you
>> like.
> 
> Well, if you can allocate some time for that, it would be appreciated!

Sure, no problem, I'll do that today.