Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758663AbXLKW2v (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:28:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758428AbXLKW2H (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:28:07 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:8143 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757414AbXLKW2F (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Dec 2007 17:28:05 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.24,154,1196668800"; d="scan'208";a="240683418" Message-ID: <475F0C6C.20900@intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:17:16 -0800 From: "Kok, Auke" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Morton CC: mbligh@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-mm1 References: <20071204211701.994dfce6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <33307c790712110813h23def95dvd068b7226e9fcd36@mail.gmail.com> <20071211123705.844aac24.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <475F00A2.6020406@intel.com> <20071211141040.a1c6f316.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071211141040.a1c6f316.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Dec 2007 22:17:49.0806 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA5260E0:01C83C43] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1634 Lines: 42 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:26:58 -0800 > "Kok, Auke" wrote: > >> Andrew Morton wrote: >>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:13:52 -0800 "Martin Bligh" wrote: >>> >>>>> - Lots of device IDs have been removed from the e1000 driver and moved >>>>> over >>>>> to e1000e. So if your e1000 stops working, you forgot to set >>>>> CONFIG_E1000E. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Wouldn't it make sense to just default this to on if E1000 was on, rather >>>> than screwing >>>> everybody for no good reason (plus breaking all the automated testing, etc >>>> etc)? >>>> Much though I love random refactoring, it is fairly painful to just keep >>>> changing the >>>> names of things. >>> (cc netdev and Auke) >>> >>> Yes, that would be very sensible. CONFIG_E1000E should default to whatever >>> CONFIG_E1000 was set to. >> which is "y" for x86 and friends, ppc, arm and ia64 through 'defconfig'. the >> Kconfig files do not have defaults in them. > > I wouldn't be looking at defconfig files - I don't think many people use > them. Most people use their previous config, via oldconfig. > > So what we want here is to give them E1000E if they had previously been > using E1000. I don't know how one would do this in Kconfig. ditto. I doubt that "SELECT E1000E" would be a good idea here (maybe not even work), and I can't think of anything else. Auke -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/