Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b995:b0:f9:9502:5bb8 with SMTP id it21csp7224293rdb; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 08:27:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IG160M7OjfkFWoUMVyISYSA7LwI5FySQI7MZ2ZFPfT32ltqHnbP3T50iU8irk5coDCLyKzP X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a3c8:b0:1d4:f0d:8ee9 with SMTP id q8-20020a170902a3c800b001d40f0d8ee9mr8805865plb.76.1704299249795; Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:27:29 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704299249; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e7U4iZBfVTWf6zF1znL7wlZ3wB91F+PoZO6/eydeXHyTjLiyvNPK5HiwCYUN4p2g7a Q1HVduwpQ0+yVrdkfzYOS9Rz+dQlE7SsKYidhlMQu11b/vsQVNwNWuyoukH+tCViOzlJ IBVniNnSM4eewl4EiTHsanyjWcd5/1v7agJX6/NaGAvmtlzYYmfrNhEn6s8tAcVE9WXz aLfq8v9Qlk6x3OYN/Au1H4fIGIs8fRZj5Ym8vF+HI+VsAoRcrYY8Gr3ihu4qVkosXjal q9CweGubcPjWIUIEmxnO7bu32urKZjGJxZIyMQh02w1Jk12x8fvje1aEUaRXYrH6TvSP 4FEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=xV2CxThpZ2QY61mwUXyAl5VSex6d7boZJfHJoZThotI=; fh=OsHDbqaXgKy7+iC1gBx8WGE20qou6aerq5siEC/iuwY=; b=zZDVIZmhfsUIpFrbY4JYAacGeeIx5h2+B76jmPLpnUND3nbvDvZ0xbm8cxUyPBvb5d Ejol2PEpsjEYDyLyq5wTnXAVa8SVdQ7WmOcsW3l04wk8idDboV+nJfpd/Wu4Fs1KsHyI Zx3qDD4QGQprrkMKpug8zNr8SVGp1AHyfvwj4bdYwaupvEIOtS89usNWoYA2h9Q/T0Ay lXcbcchjk+bCzfdL3hPfBYQLcz+y+YaZc3QMIFRAWFFcbP6SEsHp9ZAYXSimXfboCnqt D3VgILiSs6uY/tcZTT1lLWQ3U+/BbcZyVgqK8UJUovDPyEwPdxELhIKDu6ahHMBDO8x3 r/Kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HD0DJqIT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-15747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [139.178.88.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11-20020a170902ac8b00b001d42ccfb9e2si18995252plr.79.2024.01.03.08.27.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 03 Jan 2024 08:27:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=HD0DJqIT; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-15747-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED2A28355B for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943FF1BDDE; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="HD0DJqIT" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2BAC1BDC5; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05BB7C433C7; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 16:27:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1704299238; bh=m4XsQYrJ6HfS+SjOe6ZrG+l12VHI3fPy/nYoEX6pGdg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=HD0DJqITOWHoWhDOFsyJI8UOfFh621zYpsArQOTdps+zO/anadMfV0tduBVosEr0G 6LvZMFG+/Lm76Jn4pv3SmyQr2WHmtGIHd5gy2U/TuqOGrjegd2OvkrE72hv6N6weY2 1/koAYy9MT3O0QL7JfMVsM0ltJmncrBlhNqMCvcjvLpC5fHNHerFx1ozYIWgocTTlf bnZuPd+roU+Y8q3hoYbT4q6VzN/PgendBxcFzWJvc/2pen1Pq41JlXzUumHFgb1gtz xxkzb4Q+xoq4NBWuSU/IZGaMFdUs9WZ/X+jHW1vbgSx1zt387EE18jSQq/dv0oc1OJ 9XAt2VKuPNmAg== Received: by quaco.ghostprotocols.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 710C3403EF; Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:27:15 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:27:15 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ian Rogers , Song Liu Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Adrian Hunter , Song Liu , Ming Wang , Ravi Bangoria , Huacai Chen , Kan Liang , K Prateek Nayak , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf env: Avoid recursively taking env->bpf_progs.lock Message-ID: References: <20231207014655.1252484-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://acmel.wordpress.com Em Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 07:00:53PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 5:46 PM Ian Rogers wrote: > > > > Add variants of perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info, perf_env__insert_btf > > and perf_env__find_btf prefixed with __ to indicate the > > env->bpf_progs.lock is assumed held. Call these variants when the lock > > is held to avoid recursively taking it and potentially having a thread > > deadlock with itself. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers > > Ping. Applied, with that minor patch reduction hunk and this: Fixes: f8dfeae009effc0b ("perf bpf: Show more BPF program info in print_bpf_prog_info()") Song, can I have your Acked-by? - Arnaldo > > > --- > > Previously this patch was part of a larger set: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231127220902.1315692-51-irogers@google.com/ > > --- > > tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c | 8 +++--- > > tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h | 12 ++++----- > > tools/perf/util/env.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > > tools/perf/util/env.h | 4 +++ > > tools/perf/util/header.c | 8 +++--- > > 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c > > index 830711cae30d..3573e0b7ef3e 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.c > > @@ -545,9 +545,9 @@ int evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(struct evlist *evlist, struct perf_env *env) > > return evlist__add_sb_event(evlist, &attr, bpf_event__sb_cb, env); > > } > > > > -void bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info, > > - struct perf_env *env, > > - FILE *fp) > > +void __bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info, > > + struct perf_env *env, > > + FILE *fp) > > { > > __u32 *prog_lens = (__u32 *)(uintptr_t)(info->jited_func_lens); > > __u64 *prog_addrs = (__u64 *)(uintptr_t)(info->jited_ksyms); > > @@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ void bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info, > > if (info->btf_id) { > > struct btf_node *node; > > > > - node = perf_env__find_btf(env, info->btf_id); > > + node = __perf_env__find_btf(env, info->btf_id); > > if (node) > > btf = btf__new((__u8 *)(node->data), > > node->data_size); > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > > index 1bcbd4fb6c66..e2f0420905f5 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-event.h > > @@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ struct btf_node { > > int machine__process_bpf(struct machine *machine, union perf_event *event, > > struct perf_sample *sample); > > int evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(struct evlist *evlist, struct perf_env *env); > > -void bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info, > > - struct perf_env *env, > > - FILE *fp); > > +void __bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info, > > + struct perf_env *env, > > + FILE *fp); > > #else > > static inline int machine__process_bpf(struct machine *machine __maybe_unused, > > union perf_event *event __maybe_unused, > > @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ static inline int evlist__add_bpf_sb_event(struct evlist *evlist __maybe_unused, > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static inline void bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info __maybe_unused, > > - struct perf_env *env __maybe_unused, > > - FILE *fp __maybe_unused) > > +static inline void __bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(struct bpf_prog_info *info __maybe_unused, > > + struct perf_env *env __maybe_unused, > > + FILE *fp __maybe_unused) > > { > > > > } > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.c b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > index c68b7a004f29..cfdacbf29456 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.c > > @@ -22,15 +22,20 @@ struct perf_env perf_env; > > #include "bpf-utils.h" > > #include > > > > -void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > - struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node) > > +void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node) > > +{ > > + down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > + __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node); > > + up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > +} > > + > > +void __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node) > > { > > __u32 prog_id = info_node->info_linear->info.id; > > struct bpf_prog_info_node *node; > > struct rb_node *parent = NULL; > > struct rb_node **p; > > > > - down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > p = &env->bpf_progs.infos.rb_node; > > > > while (*p != NULL) { > > @@ -42,15 +47,13 @@ void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > p = &(*p)->rb_right; > > } else { > > pr_debug("duplicated bpf prog info %u\n", prog_id); > > - goto out; > > + return; > > } > > } > > > > rb_link_node(&info_node->rb_node, parent, p); > > rb_insert_color(&info_node->rb_node, &env->bpf_progs.infos); > > env->bpf_progs.infos_cnt++; > > -out: > > - up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > } > > > > struct bpf_prog_info_node *perf_env__find_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > @@ -79,14 +82,22 @@ struct bpf_prog_info_node *perf_env__find_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > } > > > > bool perf_env__insert_btf(struct perf_env *env, struct btf_node *btf_node) > > +{ > > + bool ret; > > + > > + down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > + ret = __perf_env__insert_btf(env, btf_node); > > + up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +bool __perf_env__insert_btf(struct perf_env *env, struct btf_node *btf_node) > > { > > struct rb_node *parent = NULL; > > __u32 btf_id = btf_node->id; > > struct btf_node *node; > > struct rb_node **p; > > - bool ret = true; > > > > - down_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > p = &env->bpf_progs.btfs.rb_node; > > > > while (*p != NULL) { > > @@ -98,25 +109,31 @@ bool perf_env__insert_btf(struct perf_env *env, struct btf_node *btf_node) > > p = &(*p)->rb_right; > > } else { > > pr_debug("duplicated btf %u\n", btf_id); > > - ret = false; > > - goto out; > > + return false; > > } > > } > > > > rb_link_node(&btf_node->rb_node, parent, p); > > rb_insert_color(&btf_node->rb_node, &env->bpf_progs.btfs); > > env->bpf_progs.btfs_cnt++; > > -out: > > - up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > - return ret; > > + return true; > > } > > > > struct btf_node *perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env *env, __u32 btf_id) > > +{ > > + struct btf_node *res; > > + > > + down_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > + res = __perf_env__find_btf(env, btf_id); > > + up_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > + return res; > > +} > > + > > +struct btf_node *__perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env *env, __u32 btf_id) > > { > > struct btf_node *node = NULL; > > struct rb_node *n; > > > > - down_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > n = env->bpf_progs.btfs.rb_node; > > > > while (n) { > > @@ -126,13 +143,9 @@ struct btf_node *perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env *env, __u32 btf_id) > > else if (btf_id > node->id) > > n = n->rb_right; > > else > > - goto out; > > + return node; > > } > > - node = NULL; > > - > > -out: > > - up_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > - return node; > > + return NULL; > > } > > > > /* purge data in bpf_progs.infos tree */ > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/env.h b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > index bf7e3c4c211f..7c527e65c186 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/env.h > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/env.h > > @@ -175,12 +175,16 @@ const char *perf_env__raw_arch(struct perf_env *env); > > int perf_env__nr_cpus_avail(struct perf_env *env); > > > > void perf_env__init(struct perf_env *env); > > +void __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > + struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node); > > void perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > struct bpf_prog_info_node *info_node); > > struct bpf_prog_info_node *perf_env__find_bpf_prog_info(struct perf_env *env, > > __u32 prog_id); > > bool perf_env__insert_btf(struct perf_env *env, struct btf_node *btf_node); > > +bool __perf_env__insert_btf(struct perf_env *env, struct btf_node *btf_node); > > struct btf_node *perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env *env, __u32 btf_id); > > +struct btf_node *__perf_env__find_btf(struct perf_env *env, __u32 btf_id); > > > > int perf_env__numa_node(struct perf_env *env, struct perf_cpu cpu); > > char *perf_env__find_pmu_cap(struct perf_env *env, const char *pmu_name, > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/header.c b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > index 08cc2febabde..02bf9d8b5f74 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/header.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/header.c > > @@ -1849,8 +1849,8 @@ static void print_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, FILE *fp) > > node = rb_entry(next, struct bpf_prog_info_node, rb_node); > > next = rb_next(&node->rb_node); > > > > - bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(&node->info_linear->info, > > - env, fp); > > + __bpf_event__print_bpf_prog_info(&node->info_linear->info, > > + env, fp); > > } > > > > up_read(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > @@ -3188,7 +3188,7 @@ static int process_bpf_prog_info(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) > > /* after reading from file, translate offset to address */ > > bpil_offs_to_addr(info_linear); > > info_node->info_linear = info_linear; > > - perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node); > > + __perf_env__insert_bpf_prog_info(env, info_node); > > } > > > > up_write(&env->bpf_progs.lock); > > @@ -3235,7 +3235,7 @@ static int process_bpf_btf(struct feat_fd *ff, void *data __maybe_unused) > > if (__do_read(ff, node->data, data_size)) > > goto out; > > > > - perf_env__insert_btf(env, node); > > + __perf_env__insert_btf(env, node); > > node = NULL; > > } > > > > -- > > 2.43.0.rc2.451.g8631bc7472-goog > > > -- - Arnaldo