Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-15788-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.118.232 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.118.232; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 09:06:23 -0800
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
CC: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>, "alex.williamson@redhat.com"
	<alex.williamson@redhat.com>, "robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	"baolu.lu@linux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, "cohuck@redhat.com"
	<cohuck@redhat.com>, "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "mjrosato@linux.ibm.com"
	<mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, "chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com"
	<chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>, "yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com"
	<yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>, "peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
	"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, "lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>, "Duan,
 Zhenzhong" <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>, "joao.m.martins@oracle.com"
	<joao.m.martins@oracle.com>, "Zeng, Xin" <xin.zeng@intel.com>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
	<yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] iommufd: Add data structure for Intel VT-d
 stage-1 cache invalidation
Message-ID: <ZZWUD+lCw3mRc/15@Asurada-Nvidia>
References: <BN9PR11MB5276D14D2A7FF60B41A6A7B48C93A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <ZXu5whlIGfiq16wF@Asurada-Nvidia>
 <BN9PR11MB52766D7F774510E0181CC89B8C93A@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <ZXvI2IiXwwuHRE8V@Asurada-Nvidia>
 <7c398efc-8a2f-479d-bcff-ded8cc1ef3d0@intel.com>
 <20240102233849.GK50406@nvidia.com>
 <c59a780d-4030-4815-a34b-fb2e2f902ab3@intel.com>
 <20240103160108.GP50406@nvidia.com>
 <ZZWP7iBqUtbTRb3s@Asurada-Nvidia>
 <20240103165848.GR50406@nvidia.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240103165848.GR50406@nvidia.com>
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2024 17:06:38.0408
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e0542146-6dcb-4599-ae85-08dc0c7e592d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.118.232];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource:
	MWH0EPF000989E5.namprd02.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN7PR12MB7910

On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 12:58:48PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 08:48:46AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > > You can pass the ctx to the invalidate op, it is already implied
> > > because the passed iommu_domain is linked to a single iommufd ctx.
> > 
> > The device virtual id lookup API needs something similar, yet it
> > likely needs a viommu pointer (or its id) instead? As the table
> > is attached to a viommu while an ictx can have multiple viommus,
> > right?
> 
> Yes, when we get to an API for that it will have to be some op
> 'invalidate_viommu(..)' and it can get the necessary pointers.

OK! I will try that first.

> The viommu object will have to be some driver object like the
> iommu_domain.

I drafted something like this, linking it to struct iommu_device:

+struct iommufd_viommu {
+       struct iommufd_object obj;
+       struct iommufd_ctx *ictx;
+       struct iommu_device *iommu_dev;
+       struct iommufd_hwpt_paging *hwpt;
+       /* array of struct iommufd_device, indexed by device virtual id */
+       struct xarray device_ids;
+};

Thanks
Nicolin