Received: by 2002:a05:7412:b995:b0:f9:9502:5bb8 with SMTP id it21csp7614724rdb; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 02:02:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHq9b9BIV9sFZMy1TnpXF9wn4ZgG1ytp9iNa45u/+ZRMGuNKpduZf9oKGdmJsfHP8nAdBFA X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e413:0:b0:7bb:bca0:7670 with SMTP id u19-20020a6be413000000b007bbbca07670mr369569iog.23.1704362576650; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:02:56 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704362576; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Ve+kkx7UQQ9IdTRofaGDTMna4R33Cx25nhjLIBc7Ju6fxNjpLbwsxF67WTrRr7EcRC UUlOX+phAhWDRIabpzodjT+wH6r6Tzmbv9sj2RuFl2SWUq3kR7lDFTrb7yGMEsBpfXwL fGXUNCClx2MDH99zkhd8K/ypf2QPnGGd3zozLfhBuLyMQ3qJfcozC8lJnBH15/njtCPD ASp2MVO50lRfXhjHqHbFjhC01YiFqTu2emgh4iiWB+Bcq8UECWQieECQWY/jbNR1zSuC tK3ptb5hb+zMQcJaTbuhZ83589HOgGVe6G+HhkAc5BPTGfUtiiRFfp2l69MvN7tvUmNT eroQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=SsqoTQQ6S/KQGXZbxBXDB57O2mR0DxuaSI6RPEYNPsE=; fh=99gZNR39Jvg/qLDTTF8dO5y/FV71sXBGj9rYGE/exuE=; b=0wM0ztEFm6gDTCFBO9v4Y3xjDgfGSTCkHlbYv9/CM/U9zVejN6K1RtAxs07fVnjYQv kW/NUiFhOpqVvzu72I09rFNsdmP5fs+ploEdEBUpEe2iDUIiMpVuHmlg5ZinrkV9amsp DLVCPpmJIQyVT+aV5gf4o8C2rl2qHcqjNhmdP35CMCa5vmo+LDR1i4UxulCJXie4+ZZM dTTHKgYh+YmEuR0awVVHh1wrduttPlhmSI3IEo0hetuVTToO2oGct86MCUXdwafbJ6QI VagBak2BpFNXvBqODv9m/yfosFRuu7895RhbXyRMLxTGH/SHG3eglNpxtpB56n3otnmA 2l6A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="iHvn/+ID"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16478-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-16478-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from sv.mirrors.kernel.org (sv.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45e3:2400::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n4-20020a637204000000b005cec854edacsi917274pgc.371.2024.01.04.02.02.56 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:02:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16478-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b="iHvn/+ID"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16478-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-16478-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org"; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sv.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DE20286A76 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FAC20B08; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:02:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="iHvn/+ID" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7690208D3; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:02:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-7bb5fda069bso10615439f.0; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:02:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1704362566; x=1704967366; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=SsqoTQQ6S/KQGXZbxBXDB57O2mR0DxuaSI6RPEYNPsE=; b=iHvn/+ID9nSerrZ9c3P+OywbM4YjQ3dtPL/eQhpdVYAE+PCOM77hlz3qwZLVxHdGCW yGmxg44YeaPaxIgfOKdm17XAR7K869gRaIrE8CQnb2gzFbfYp9YRWp/mBZueRZlqUWn1 XrU9jKqAsIMWPp/MZ2epH++mkXdkfLlMCj4B66aBIKcYP7/nCk982d5IBHATSlhQ9f/1 nt7R41Bihu75umSMYm3m2P7ZGKjLKPeQ+h84xj3lzIXhM6nlLt+k+mCN1NkSzPQC6ky2 FOUpNCRyII2K3yMkafITzpya/ZVCU5y1MJgLLFmb1SsntEJfETb/+VgXtkZBnIik3cvS 1UGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704362566; x=1704967366; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=SsqoTQQ6S/KQGXZbxBXDB57O2mR0DxuaSI6RPEYNPsE=; b=bcm9MIXCTC1InyYzfXjhhNyojveJzwpCoVaZ0E0a2EPywSRcOZzThm7E4DA47x89M1 Q7MGY91pk0vQBrXUV5/4Mt0K6efFFD0C2iyURdO2zSQAuyYTWSJ6sMvLcQZzR3fB9Oug GpiCYGMH3yrO8TUSsz9F9qJI8XHoq3BRVYsyUP2TU4oHx2siWI4XB+l+aPWU2pLz4Ev4 1lxBhHBopwXBkLqXVLlOR0Mb5CxcOnuUMFtWZFF8pNGI4ZC98vkNj860XHqXnwLAouvV 05tfrluexD5crdhozoXNOfua2P+u0zyjW1Ux8FtF1HfxXj1PpvH8XWW/yt8JiU+bycBK wkVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwzXcEurvvI0+8loIelg2jdBIDYGhRBJSGKUSb+mpF/8u+k7g8I scVHy4Z3hpYC7iTLumrL9Kq1J19MNOrX5w== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:6505:0:b0:7b7:fac9:b3aa with SMTP id z5-20020a6b6505000000b007b7fac9b3aamr320812iob.29.1704362565707; Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from archie.me ([103.131.18.64]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g33-20020a635221000000b0058ee60f8e4dsm23870038pgb.34.2024.01.04.02.02.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Jan 2024 02:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by archie.me (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 582A91837AF8A; Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:02:41 +0700 (WIB) Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:02:41 +0700 From: Bagas Sanjaya To: Thierry Reding , Lee Jones , Jingoo Han , Linus Torvalds Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Sean Young , Flavio Suligoi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux DRI Development Subject: Re: (subset) linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree Message-ID: References: <20231221165805.0c4771c1@canb.auug.org.au> <170316329164.542553.8341559295114557258.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20231221125801.GG10102@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QNFbmQpVZ93cppeG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --QNFbmQpVZ93cppeG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [also add Jingoo (additional backlight maintainer) and Linus] On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:34:57PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:58:01PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > >=20 > > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:58:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > After merging the backlight tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > >=20 > > > > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c: In function 'mp3309c_bl_update_s= tatus': > > > > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c:134:23: error: implicit declarati= on of function 'pwm_apply_state'; did you mean 'pwm_apply_args'? [-Werror= =3Dimplicit-function-declaration] > > > > 134 | ret =3D pwm_apply_state(chip->pwmd, &pwmsta= te); > > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > > > | pwm_apply_args > > > >=20 > > > > [...] > > >=20 > > > Applied, thanks! > > >=20 > > > [1/1] linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree > > > commit: f7baa9ccef93ba1c36a8ecf58c2f4e86fb3181b9 > >=20 > > Actually it's: > >=20 > > f7baa9ccef93b ("backlight: mp3309c: Rename pwm_apply_state() to pwm_= apply_might_sleep()") > >=20 > > But don't bank on the commit ID staying the same. >=20 > This is likely going to break the build on your branch because > pwm_apply_might_sleep() is only available in the PWM tree right now. In > any case, I've now pushed a commit that adds pwm_apply_state() back as a > compatibility stub, so it should be okay for you to drop this if you > run into problems. It's always possible that somebody else wants to add > a new caller of pwm_apply_state() and in retrospect we should've > probably done this from the start, at least as a transitional measure > for one or two cycles. >=20 Hi Lee and Thierry, I know that we're still on New Year vibes, so some things are not up to full steam for now; but since we're close to v6.7 release and v6.8 merge window, hence allow me to ask: Stephen Rothwell is still complaining about backlight tree build failure due to f7baa9ccef93b, yet it has not been fixed so far. Has the culprit been dropped/reverted as he requested? The worst case is the culprit slips through and become part of backlight PR and Linus will likely not happy with the build regression (maybe he had to fix by himself). Thanks. --=20 An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara --QNFbmQpVZ93cppeG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZZaCPQAKCRD2uYlJVVFO o30uAQCpOUQNLZSsWEF7o4VwnEeONRRU8z0ZDQlzK20JAUQHPwEA2mqQa3jDEv5p vSerVltHJ5q3FS1SCjRw9gKeiD+FjQo= =wZkt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QNFbmQpVZ93cppeG--