Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16537-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231229090643.116575-1-qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
 <20231229090643.116575-2-qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com> <c5f7571e-8c99-4143-bfcd-cfd5b08329a9@linaro.org>
 <CAJRtX8SjutyeA29zvkHR2LmoPF0BSWSVVg44MOGqzn5znOmQVw@mail.gmail.com> <7a2957c4-d020-4948-8964-4375f6319f32@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <7a2957c4-d020-4948-8964-4375f6319f32@linaro.org>
From: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 18:49:42 +0800
Message-ID: <CAJRtX8T=mMUS8WszCEdF-SYXV22RikWV4tg4t0rPss2599jYfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: rtc: sophgo: add RTC for Sophgo
 CV1800 series SoC.
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, 
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com, aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, 
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dlan@gentoo.org, inochiama@outlook.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 6:44=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/01/2024 11:34, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 4:32=E2=80=AFPM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29/12/2023 10:06, Jingbao Qiu wrote:
> >>> Add devicetree binding to describe the RTC for Sophgo CV1800 SoC.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingbao Qiu <qiujingbao.dlmu@gmail.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> This patch depends on the clk driver
> >>> Clk driver link:
> >>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/IA1PR20MB49539CDAD9A268CBF6CA184BBB9FA@IA=
1PR20MB4953.namprd20.prod.outlook.com/
> >>
> >> I don't understand how binding can depend on a driver. This is very
> >> confusing and suggests you write binding for the driver, which is not
> >> what we want.
> >>
> >> What's more, I really do not see the dependency here, so your message =
is
> >> incorrect?
> >>
> >
> > What I mean is that clk is used in the following example. In the clk
> > patch, there
> > is a macro definition that can be used to replace this number.
>
> And how is this a dependency?

Thanks. I will drop it.

Best regards,
Jingbao Qiu

>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>