Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16667-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 12:50:28 +0000
From: Sean Young <sean@mess.org>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@asem.it>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: (subset) linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
Message-ID: <ZZaplFvjLADNz-2m@gofer.mess.org>
References: <20231221165805.0c4771c1@canb.auug.org.au>
 <170316329164.542553.8341559295114557258.b4-ty@kernel.org>
 <20231221125801.GG10102@google.com>
 <ZYSFUZf8NcK5vvLv@orome.fritz.box>
 <ZZaCQahr3t8CUumD@archie.me>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZZaCQahr3t8CUumD@archie.me>

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 05:02:41PM +0700, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> [also add Jingoo (additional backlight maintainer) and Linus]
> 
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:34:57PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:58:01PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2023, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:58:05 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > > > After merging the backlight tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > > > > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c: In function 'mp3309c_bl_update_status':
> > > > > drivers/video/backlight/mp3309c.c:134:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'pwm_apply_state'; did you mean 'pwm_apply_args'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > > >   134 |                 ret = pwm_apply_state(chip->pwmd, &pwmstate);
> > > > >       |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > >       |                       pwm_apply_args
> > > > > 
> > > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > Applied, thanks!
> > > > 
> > > > [1/1] linux-next: build failure after merge of the pwm tree
> > > >       commit: f7baa9ccef93ba1c36a8ecf58c2f4e86fb3181b9
> > > 
> > > Actually it's:
> > > 
> > >   f7baa9ccef93b ("backlight: mp3309c: Rename  pwm_apply_state() to pwm_apply_might_sleep()")
> > > 
> > > But don't bank on the commit ID staying the same.
> > 
> > This is likely going to break the build on your branch because
> > pwm_apply_might_sleep() is only available in the PWM tree right now. In
> > any case, I've now pushed a commit that adds pwm_apply_state() back as a
> > compatibility stub, so it should be okay for you to drop this if you
> > run into problems. It's always possible that somebody else wants to add
> > a new caller of pwm_apply_state() and in retrospect we should've
> > probably done this from the start, at least as a transitional measure
> > for one or two cycles.
> > 
> 
> Hi Lee and Thierry,
> 
> I know that we're still on New Year vibes, so some things are not up to full
> steam for now; but since we're close to v6.7 release and v6.8 merge window,
> hence allow me to ask:
> 
> Stephen Rothwell is still complaining about backlight tree build failure
> due to f7baa9ccef93b, yet it has not been fixed so far. Has the culprit
> been dropped/reverted as he requested? The worst case is the culprit slips
> through and become part of backlight PR and Linus will likely not happy
> with the build regression (maybe he had to fix by himself).

This should be fixed by 9a216587a03df, and on current linux-next I can't 
reproduce the problem any more (x86_64 allmodconfig).

Thanks,
Sean