Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-16877-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:46:14 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	u-boot@lists.denx.de,
	=?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] nvmem: layouts: add U-Boot env layout
Message-ID: <2024010446-willfully-swoop-8510@gregkh>
References: <20231221173421.13737-1-zajec5@gmail.com>
 <20231221173421.13737-6-zajec5@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20231221173421.13737-6-zajec5@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 06:34:21PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> 
> Move all generic (NVMEM devices independent) code from NVMEM device
> driver to NVMEM layout driver. Then add a simple NVMEM layout code on
> top of it.
> 
> Thanks to proper layout it's possible to support U-Boot env data stored
> on any kind of NVMEM device.
> 
> For backward compatibility with old DT bindings we need to keep old
> NVMEM device driver functional. To avoid code duplication export and
> reuse a parsing function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> Reviewed-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
> ---
> V2: Support new compatibles & use device_get_match_data() helper
> V3: Use imperative in commit body
> 
> IMPORTANT:
> This is based on top of the:
> [PATCH v6.8 1/2] nvmem: layouts: refactor .add_cells() callback arguments

I applied patches 2-5 in this series, I'll let you rebase the remaining
two after addressing the issues discussed in patch 1.

thanks,

gre gk-h