Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-17152-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 19:23:55 +0000
From: Qais Yousef <qyousef@layalina.io>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com,
	amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, amit.kachhap@gmail.com,
	daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
	len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	wvw@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 15/23] PM: EM: Optimize em_cpu_energy() and remove
 division
Message-ID: <20240104192355.mrtqnek2cyw7rlkd@airbuntu>
References: <20231129110853.94344-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <20231129110853.94344-16-lukasz.luba@arm.com>
 <20231228180647.rwz4u7ebk5p2hjcr@airbuntu>
 <d9bea2d0-3869-4f08-8eb8-0ca33ce525ea@arm.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d9bea2d0-3869-4f08-8eb8-0ca33ce525ea@arm.com>

On 01/02/24 11:47, Lukasz Luba wrote:
> > Did you see a problem or just being extra cautious here?
> 
> There is no problem, 'cost' is a private coefficient for EAS only.

Let me  ask differently, what goes wrong if you don't increase the resolution
here? Why is it necessary?


Cheers

--
Qais Yousef