Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:48:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:48:20 -0500 Received: from pcow029o.blueyonder.co.uk ([195.188.53.123]:49938 "EHLO blueyonder.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 15:48:17 -0500 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: James A Sutherland To: Alan Cox , rhw@MemAlpha.cx Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] unchecked request_region's in drivers/net Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:48:52 +0000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: adilger@turbolabs.com (Andreas Dilger), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (Linux Kernel) In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 28 December 2001 6:48 pm, Alan Cox wrote: > > currently is, but add a PATCHES-TO file in each subdirectory that > > states how to handle patches relating to that directory, and have > > these files follow a strict format, possibly... > > Add the patches to to the maintainers as another field. If the patches > go to someone who isnt claiming to be a maintainer something is wrong Except it seems maintainers is, er, unmaintained... Dave's/my solution looks good from this point of view, allowing others to "subscribe" to track patches to subsystems they care about. As well as allowing Al to remain a "closet maintainer", rather than putting him in maintainers :) James. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/