Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-17273-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:40f1:3f00::1;
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 23:06:35 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
To: Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@marvell.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	rric@kernel.org, cchavva@marvell.com, sgarapati@marvell.com, 
	jannadurai@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: thunderx: Marvell thunderx i2c changes
Message-ID: <nu6py2gosmy33ge4mozuisyfyfdw6i7j4i77o6v2xudyshosso@3x3frfn5gomd>
References: <20230728120004.19680-1-pmalgujar@marvell.com>
 <20231024201440.ey7pjah7fq33mbwm@zenone.zhora.eu>
 <20231026125429.GA22428@Dell2s-9>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231026125429.GA22428@Dell2s-9>

Hi Piyush,

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 05:54:29AM -0700, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:14:40PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> > Hi Piyush,
> > 
> > On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 05:00:00AM -0700, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> > > The changes are for Marvell OcteonTX2 SOC family:
> > > 
> > > - Handling clock divisor logic using subsytem ID
> > > - Support for high speed mode
> > > - Handle watchdog timeout
> > > - Added ioclk support
> > > 
> > > Changes since V1:
> > > - Addressed comments, added defines as required
> > > - Removed unnecessary code
> > > - Added a patch to support ioclk if sclk not present in ACPI table
> > > 
> > > Piyush Malgujar (1):
> > >   i2c: thunderx: Adding ioclk support
> > > 
> > > Suneel Garapati (3):
> > >   i2c: thunderx: Clock divisor logic changes
> > >   i2c: thunderx: Add support for High speed mode
> > >   i2c: octeon: Handle watchdog timeout
> > > 
> > >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c     | 96 ++++++++++++++++++------
> > >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.h     | 27 +++++++
> > >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-thunderx-pcidrv.c | 23 ++++--
> > >  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > 
> > I was going through the patches that failed to receive an answer,
> > is this series still valid? Do you still need a round of review
> > here?
> > 
> > Andi
> 
> Hi Andi,
> 
> Yes, these patches are still valid. These have been acked by you
> and were waiting to get reply from Robert.
> Please review the patches.

sorry for the very late response... I guess we won't receive any
answer from Robert... do you mind respinning the series as this
doesn't apply anymore?

Thanks,
Andi