Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-17457-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Message-ID: <5a1f1ff3-8a61-67cf-59a9-ce498738d912@landley.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 21:52:00 -0600
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] Remove UCLINUX from LTP
Content-Language: en-US
To: Cyril Hrubis <chrubis@suse.cz>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>, ltp@lists.linux.it,
 Li Wang <liwang@redhat.com>, Andrea Cervesato <andrea.cervesato@suse.com>,
 Greg Ungerer <gerg@linux-m68k.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
 Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>,
 Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>,
 linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
 linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
 Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20240103015240.1065284-1-pvorel@suse.cz>
 <CAMuHMdXGwyS-CL0vLdUP4Z4YEYhmcmDyC3YdGCnS=jFkqASqvw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20240103114957.GD1073466@pevik>
 <CAMuHMdX0s0gLRoPtjJmDnSmZ_MNY590dN+JxM1HKAL1g_bjX+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZZVOhlGPg5KRyS-F@yuki>
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
In-Reply-To: <ZZVOhlGPg5KRyS-F@yuki>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 1/3/24 06:09, Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>> I am not sure I agree with this series.
>> Removing support for UCLINUX from LTP is almost a guarantee for
>> not noticing when more breakage is introduced.
>> 
>> How exactly is UCLINUX broken in LTP?
> 
> As far as we know noone is using it and nobody is maintaing it for a
> decade,

Nobody is maintaining "uclinux" because that was a distro, but you can build
nommu support in buildroot and such, and people do.

Rob