Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-17871-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
In-Reply-To: <xd2ryic6mr6d6cbljjbhmr56mfpchfzkmc3lnznhmoiwyzip2a@6bhbho267e7c>
References: <20231222094548.54103-1-william.qiu@starfivetech.com>
 <20231222094548.54103-4-william.qiu@starfivetech.com> <CAJM55Z9tyrR7emEBrY0+Fnc_LUFQHkqYHLQ4ptL=XQMy52qtVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <xd2ryic6mr6d6cbljjbhmr56mfpchfzkmc3lnznhmoiwyzip2a@6bhbho267e7c>
Precedence: bulk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 05:18:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJM55Z9DgFCwXjQGhe+urnOg-AkJMbQUR+biXKONQsRcup1GXw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] riscv: dts: starfive: jh7100: Add PWM node and
 pins configuration
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, 
	Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Cc: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, 
	linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, 
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, 
	Hal Feng <hal.feng@starfivetech.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote:
> Hello Emil,
>
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 02:49:34AM -0800, Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> > William Qiu wrote:
> > > Add OpenCores PWM controller node and add PWM pins configuration
> > > on VisionFive 1 board.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@starfivetech.com>
> >
> > Sorry, I thought I already sent my review. This looks good.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
>
> Is this also an implicit Ack to take this patch via the pwm tree once
> the earlier patches are ready? Or do you want to take it via your tree?
> (Maybe already now together with the binding? If so, you can assume my
> Reviewed-by to be an implicit Ack for that.)

Yes, sorry. This is also meant to be an Ack from me.

I imagined the dt patches would go through Conor's riscv-dt-for-next branch=
,
but the pwm tree is certainly also fine by.

/Emil