Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-18955-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240104185138.169307-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> <20240104185138.169307-3-jeffxu@chromium.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240104185138.169307-3-jeffxu@chromium.org>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 10:41:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiy0nHG9+3rXzQa=W8gM8F6-MhsHrs_ZqWaHtjmPK4=FA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] mseal: add mseal syscall
To: jeffxu@chromium.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, jannh@google.com, 
	sroettger@google.com, willy@infradead.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, 
	usama.anjum@collabora.com, jeffxu@google.com, jorgelo@chromium.org, 
	groeck@chromium.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, pedro.falcato@gmail.com, 
	dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, deraadt@openbsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

One comment:

On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 at 10:51, <jeffxu@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sys_ni.c b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> index 9a846439b36a..02280199069b 100644
> --- a/kernel/sys_ni.c
> +++ b/kernel/sys_ni.c
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ COND_SYSCALL(migrate_pages);
>  COND_SYSCALL(move_pages);
>  COND_SYSCALL(set_mempolicy_home_node);
>  COND_SYSCALL(cachestat);
> +COND_SYSCALL(mseal);
>
>  COND_SYSCALL(perf_event_open);
>  COND_SYSCALL(accept4);

Move this part to PATCH 1/1, so that it all builds cleanly.

Other than that, this seems all reasonable to me now.

                  Linus