Received: by 2002:a05:7412:98c1:b0:fa:551:50a7 with SMTP id kc1csp1536177rdb; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 02:18:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEy0mBMyx5rS84Pcz/eTrzGKfkp4GiaEM/xDC0/aGls4qrrgQtRN/2bv+rBkqEVfIrjExyU X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c6d:b0:680:ff04:759e with SMTP id t13-20020a0562140c6d00b00680ff04759emr2976380qvj.42.1704709089470; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 02:18:09 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704709089; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BV4t0tGwUUSO+kWmMq4Zq74bhF9vEfkLTtQ9MZ5LrIy8Z1VQzIeG4J/FJ7S7qNTHFL 4QwxJdWxuPLJVGM8Vi1vvRr820FVo+c1lHq6o2dXiGBj7xbxN5F3tIDqvB66Ev2w4jUE hdKxKtzh4F2Tt6QWpdQCaIPymlefPqJdyfWT1/4AB0ClOweTQwDfV7zcgbKjxw67MU3V fp/nmw1S/rSahiTP9wWex7/OHGnyE4moXiZunfiiO+qoy10LCt6IdnJXhMi0aT7+ldPN m0LmmYy00+cPobewmnuwUMd7IEwvhL3AHH52Q7Ijql4yzTIo4SJkIOOyiMLq50asOqLX ZjyA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-id:precedence :dkim-signature; bh=n+s3i7ULFHDXKn2RzndAY0qvbKNroYnauIf17/cWotw=; fh=gxs3Kvpm6b1iVP/nabTBlSLECmgxhn0Jl5dvHhMD6zU=; b=ama7WXZX4LTlqW/oxkgtvZx8IKFXwj1wquvd3ZQpqlRJF1/ItCDUdYWOvUyW8TJJLE tgXlCxyjAvljuGT6he/JpmEht1nVcKarPWhZYmlLKXDKhg5cetz6vTLQxBofQPHlPsm8 5LwH0ioaFBJe92oe1XJi+aUtpIY96mSbMq5DLaJf2DuKGRwg7pZtVZ1S7i3rNdxUtWkt eboW8VTSDKNne8crdYduuEaTt/GbwreBPbUzvt7hJB6H/COMWswnu5GyEBZH2MeAPupj kyxu32f2/Z+ny1idr8vwgRgBeBQdKaJlIHof+LoJEgEkhr+bPYjP+ZWe+4j3x/P6AhIG ECJQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@0x0f.com header.s=google header.b="oFAkI/Ra"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [147.75.199.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g5-20020a0cdf05000000b0067f32b8e421si7192499qvl.417.2024.01.08.02.18.09 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Jan 2024 02:18:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@0x0f.com header.s=google header.b="oFAkI/Ra"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C3D51C2202C for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D6A13AE3; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=0x0f.com header.i=@0x0f.com header.b="oFAkI/Ra" X-Original-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-pf1-f178.google.com (mail-pf1-f178.google.com [209.85.210.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFB0134A9 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=0x0f.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=0x0f.com Received: by mail-pf1-f178.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-6d9b2c8e2a4so1646884b3a.0 for ; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 02:18:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=0x0f.com; s=google; t=1704709080; x=1705313880; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n+s3i7ULFHDXKn2RzndAY0qvbKNroYnauIf17/cWotw=; b=oFAkI/RaHvTEn+Ixmbw7ZRawBLNAtHB6SLIjX0lzeO7/EsTexeDtYmbRRoMQ7LW/9F 2jYHNXWJBZthxzbE4QekzXbRJPkm3MO0B0PUV8rhJsug2FWIzbAYLsUYDjkTWM2ttXRj nrShPAvbjv1N+Cp67khiIl8wY0Z3mM4TZbrbQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704709080; x=1705313880; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=n+s3i7ULFHDXKn2RzndAY0qvbKNroYnauIf17/cWotw=; b=KXjRcAqQ777/CJPRVmW94lJ+5COHUliUobHCoppTMsRUrN8LjOznSqfIm9xxpVlGh5 IYNwj9wa8wS4SG07xF2bFOzGSLl8QZexrbxwudF26xtkc7zfq0nk7kNXTgBn3hGVqtvp VOJVC8uTMAQz9aJxVgE/YmTQEeOmEbQpoPZt2hxbOnamQxyVqyeLEjr9dwS+VGNUX3hO Opv6/BQ+6z9AqdqjuBZ765mh/z+T7HluBiIYVQEkxOHLbSEXKeLlWAnGmX+qbDIz2cOt /wMBcjP7F9S0NQIZdUm1guhL2C+1Q7dVhqsO/VwpsZ1Yf40HCH71HkBqOQTxQ/Cc5op9 iqrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyLVVB4rzynyShu8LjkjMNjmT18Zq63kMTmA0XCRSYboT/rU7Lp QahK0Q5gkbDAUXAgbp+e6cGVcoaAwDIZo1/7HgjjghY9bMwHrw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1ad3:b0:6d8:e153:f884 with SMTP id f19-20020a056a001ad300b006d8e153f884mr7325344pfv.30.1704709079932; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 02:17:59 -0800 (PST) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240108093221.1477020-1-daniel@0x0f.com> <20240108093221.1477020-3-daniel@0x0f.com> In-Reply-To: From: Daniel Palmer Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 19:17:49 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68k: Fix interrupt stack frames for 68000 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: gerg@linux-m68k.org, fthain@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Geert, On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 18:56, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I think it would be better to use the classic m68k stack frame. > That would pave the way for building a single nommu kernel for > MC680[012346]0 that runs on e.g. any Amiga. > MC68000 and Coldfire are incompatible anyway. Ok, I'll work that out. I have an A600 with an 020 board so I could actually test it on real hardware. :) Cheers, Daniel