Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-19329-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240108093221.1477020-1-daniel@0x0f.com> <20240108093221.1477020-3-daniel@0x0f.com>
 <CAMuHMdX44A6+BNByuvbCC2gcM5vAipbaGAK7L8Vh8q3tMynBbQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX44A6+BNByuvbCC2gcM5vAipbaGAK7L8Vh8q3tMynBbQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Palmer <daniel@0x0f.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 19:17:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAFr9PX=g+tVRYwhXkrPK421RW7ba1M1H2pM_AR6sJNx+oTFwjg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68k: Fix interrupt stack frames for 68000
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: gerg@linux-m68k.org, fthain@linux-m68k.org, 
	linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Geert,

On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 18:56, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> I think it would be better to use the classic m68k stack frame.
> That would pave the way for building a single nommu kernel for
> MC680[012346]0 that runs on e.g. any Amiga.
> MC68000 and Coldfire are incompatible anyway.

Ok, I'll work that out. I have an A600 with an 020 board so I could
actually test it on real hardware. :)

Cheers,

Daniel