Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:42:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:42:38 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:45835 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:42:32 -0500 Message-ID: <3C2CF2A8.9010406@evision-ventures.com> Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:31:04 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Larry McVoy CC: Keith Owens , "Eric S. Raymond" , Dave Jones , "Eric S. Raymond" , Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: State of the new config & build system In-Reply-To: <20011227173739.U25698@work.bitmover.com> <18754.1009503708@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20011227174723.V25698@work.bitmover.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Larry McVoy wrote: >On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:41:48PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote: > >>On Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:37:39 -0800, >>Larry McVoy wrote: >> >>>A couple of questions: >>> >>>a) will 2.5 be as fast as the current system? Faster? >>> >>At the moment kbuild 2.5 ranges from 10% faster on small builds to 100% >>slower on a full kernel build. >> > >I don't understand why it would be slower. > Thank's go to basically to python and other excessfull overengineering there. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/