Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-19712-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:31:19 +0100
From: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@gmail.com>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 4/5] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: fix typos
Message-ID: <20240108143119.GB36576@debian>
References: <20240108093702.13476-1-dima.fedrau@gmail.com>
 <20240108093702.13476-5-dima.fedrau@gmail.com>
 <10b09d30-70c6-4f87-8367-19b2579496a1@lunn.ch>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <10b09d30-70c6-4f87-8367-19b2579496a1@lunn.ch>

Am Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:02:18PM +0100 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> > Rename mv88q2xxxx_get_sqi to mv88q2xxx_get_sqi and
> > mv88q2xxxx_get_sqi_max to mv88q2xxx_get_sqi_max.
> > Fix linebreaks and use everywhere hexadecimal numbers written with
> > lowercase letters instead of mixing it up.
> 
> You could split is up into three patches. Its probably not worth it
> now, but its something to remember for the future.
> 
> Ideally you want lots of small patches which are obviously correct.  A
> patch just containing a rename mv88q2xxxx_get_XXX to
> mv88q2xxx_get_sqi_XXX etc, should be obviously correct, and just takes
> a few seconds to review.
> 
> A patch adding a few line breaks should again take a few seconds to
> review.
> 
> Upper case to lower case is easy to review.
> 
> When it is all mixed together, in a bigger patch it takes a bit more
> effort to review, a bit more effort is needed to look for typ0s etc.
> Its can be faster and easier to review 10 very simple patches than 3
> big patches...
>
It makes totally sense to me. Haven't thought about it. Thanks for
your explanation. I will keep it in mind for future patches.

>     Andrew

Best regards,
Dimitri