Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:51:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:51:28 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:23716 "EHLO bitmover.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 17:51:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 14:51:13 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: Keith Owens , Larry McVoy , "Eric S. Raymond" , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: State of the new config & build system Message-ID: <20011228145113.I3727@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kai Germaschewski , Keith Owens , Larry McVoy , "Eric S. Raymond" , Dave Jones , Linus Torvalds , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <18619.1009503350@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de on Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:56:53PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:56:53PM +0100, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > A couple of months ago, I came up with an alternative to kbuild 2.5. It > doesn't try to have all the features kbuild 2.5 has, but solves the major > problems with kbuild 2.4. So has anyone looked at this? Is this a viable choice? I've heard nothing since Kai posted this. Keith? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/