Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-20291-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Message-ID: <6030f1aa-6c7f-41d7-e1b8-06cfca22d60b@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 10:34:28 +0800
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.9.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: check alloc_size before the allocation of a new
 memory pool
Content-Language: en-US
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
CC: <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	<petr.tesarik1@huawei-partners.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	<sunnanyong@huawei.com>
References: <20240108140005.3355316-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
 <20240108170649.GA11047@lst.de>
From: "zhangpeng (AS)" <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240108170649.GA11047@lst.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2024/1/9 1:06, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> This looks good, but the surrounding code changed quite a bit in
> the dma-mapping code.  Can you redo it against dma-mapping for-next
> (which should get merged into Linus' tree ASAP as I already sent the
> pull request)

Of course, I'll rebase to the for-next branch in the next version. Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Peng