Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-21141-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.80.249 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.80.249;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240109164655.626085-1-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
 <20240109164655.626085-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <CAJZ5v0ixmEiOhwBHkDqH8QNtchiszAEi0rY2pDCGHXiWHob0NA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0ixmEiOhwBHkDqH8QNtchiszAEi0rY2pDCGHXiWHob0NA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 18:00:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAncXsNa6_8PXfn3Hv0G03WN79QgPQafJqPSo-3oJm6KA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux@armlinux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, 
	sudeep.holla@arm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org, 
	andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org, mingo@redhat.com, 
	peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, 
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, 
	vschneid@redhat.com, lukasz.luba@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, 
	mhiramat@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, 
	corbet@lwn.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, 
	qyousef@layalina.io
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 at 17:49, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 5:47=E2=80=AFPM Vincent Guittot
> <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Provide to the scheduler a feedback about the temporary max available
> > capacity. Unlike arch_update_thermal_pressure, this doesn't need to be
> > filtered as the pressure will happen for dozens ms or more.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
>
> and I think I've given the tag on this patch already.

yes, I preferred to not add it after the crap that I did in the v3
with the cleanup of this [1/5] patch

Thanks

>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 10 ++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > index 44db4f59c4cc..f4eee3d107f1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -2563,6 +2563,40 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *po=
licy, unsigned int cpu)
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
> >
> > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpufreq_pressure);
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * cpufreq_update_pressure() - Update cpufreq pressure for CPUs
> > + * @policy: cpufreq policy of the CPUs.
> > + *
> > + * Update the value of cpufreq pressure for all @cpus in the policy.
> > + */
> > +static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > +       unsigned long max_capacity, capped_freq, pressure;
> > +       u32 max_freq;
> > +       int cpu;
> > +
> > +       cpu =3D cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
> > +       max_freq =3D arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> > +       capped_freq =3D policy->max;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * Handle properly the boost frequencies, which should simply c=
lean
> > +        * the cpufreq pressure value.
> > +        */
> > +       if (max_freq <=3D capped_freq) {
> > +               pressure =3D 0;
> > +       } else {
> > +               max_capacity =3D arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
> > +               pressure =3D max_capacity -
> > +                          mult_frac(max_capacity, capped_freq, max_fre=
q);
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)
> > +               WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu(cpufreq_pressure, cpu), pressure);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * cpufreq_set_policy - Modify cpufreq policy parameters.
> >   * @policy: Policy object to modify.
> > @@ -2618,6 +2652,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_poli=
cy *policy,
> >         policy->max =3D __resolve_freq(policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_REL=
ATION_H);
> >         trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy);
> >
> > +       cpufreq_update_pressure(policy);
> > +
> >         policy->cached_target_freq =3D UINT_MAX;
> >
> >         pr_debug("new min and max freqs are %u - %u kHz\n",
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > index afda5f24d3dd..b1d97edd3253 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> > @@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cp=
ufreq_policy *policy);
> >  void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> >  void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
> >  bool has_target_index(void);
> > +
> > +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpufreq_pressure);
> > +static inline unsigned long cpufreq_get_pressure(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +       return per_cpu(cpufreq_pressure, cpu);
> > +}
> >  #else
> >  static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
> >  {
> > @@ -263,6 +269,10 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_supports_freq_invarianc=
e(void)
> >         return false;
> >  }
> >  static inline void disable_cpufreq(void) { }
> > +static inline unsigned long cpufreq_get_pressure(int cpu)
> > +{
> > +       return 0;
> > +}
> >  #endif
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >