Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:25:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:25:22 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:65035 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:23:27 -0500 Message-ID: <3C2CFC42.7000401@evision-ventures.com> Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:12:02 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20011226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linus Torvalds CC: Alan Cox , esr@thyrsus.com, Legacy Fishtank , Dave Jones , "Eric S. Raymond" , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: State of the new config & build system In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > >>It would certainly fit nicely with the existing metadata. We already rip out >>code comments via kernel-doc, and extending it to rip out >> >> - Help text >> - Web site >> >... > >No no no. > >The comments can at least be helpful to programmers, whether ripped out or >not. > >Extra stuff is not helpful to anybody, and is just really irritating. I >personally despise source trees that start out with one page of copyright >statement crap, it just detracts from the real _point_ of the .c file, >which is to contain C code. Making it a comment requirement is > > - stupid: > we have a filesystem, guys > Not quite... It is making moving patches through e-mail around easier... > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/