Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-21873-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <2a8d2a76-5779-4c12-93b1-d06508c3cf0f@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 10:04:11 +0100
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
Reply-To: neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/meson: vclk: fix calculation of 59.94 fractional
 rates
Content-Language: en-US, fr
To: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
 Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
 dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20240109230704.4120561-1-christianshewitt@gmail.com>
Autocrypt: addr=neil.armstrong@linaro.org; keydata=
 xsBNBE1ZBs8BCAD78xVLsXPwV/2qQx2FaO/7mhWL0Qodw8UcQJnkrWmgTFRobtTWxuRx8WWP
 GTjuhvbleoQ5Cxjr+v+1ARGCH46MxFP5DwauzPekwJUD5QKZlaw/bURTLmS2id5wWi3lqVH4
 BVF2WzvGyyeV1o4RTCYDnZ9VLLylJ9bneEaIs/7cjCEbipGGFlfIML3sfqnIvMAxIMZrvcl9
 qPV2k+KQ7q+aXavU5W+yLNn7QtXUB530Zlk/d2ETgzQ5FLYYnUDAaRl+8JUTjc0CNOTpCeik
 80TZcE6f8M76Xa6yU8VcNko94Ck7iB4vj70q76P/J7kt98hklrr85/3NU3oti3nrIHmHABEB
 AAHNKk5laWwgQXJtc3Ryb25nIDxuZWlsLmFybXN0cm9uZ0BsaW5hcm8ub3JnPsLAkQQTAQoA
 OwIbIwULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgBYhBInsPQWERiF0UPIoSBaat7Gkz/iuBQJk
 Q5wSAhkBAAoJEBaat7Gkz/iuyhMIANiD94qDtUTJRfEW6GwXmtKWwl/mvqQtaTtZID2dos04
 YqBbshiJbejgVJjy+HODcNUIKBB3PSLaln4ltdsV73SBcwUNdzebfKspAQunCM22Mn6FBIxQ
 GizsMLcP/0FX4en9NaKGfK6ZdKK6kN1GR9YffMJd2P08EO8mHowmSRe/ExAODhAs9W7XXExw
 UNCY4pVJyRPpEhv373vvff60bHxc1k/FF9WaPscMt7hlkbFLUs85kHtQAmr8pV5Hy9ezsSRa
 GzJmiVclkPc2BY592IGBXRDQ38urXeM4nfhhvqA50b/nAEXc6FzqgXqDkEIwR66/Gbp0t3+r
 yQzpKRyQif3OwE0ETVkGzwEIALyKDN/OGURaHBVzwjgYq+ZtifvekdrSNl8TIDH8g1xicBYp
 QTbPn6bbSZbdvfeQPNCcD4/EhXZuhQXMcoJsQQQnO4vwVULmPGgtGf8PVc7dxKOeta+qUh6+
 SRh3vIcAUFHDT3f/Zdspz+e2E0hPV2hiSvICLk11qO6cyJE13zeNFoeY3ggrKY+IzbFomIZY
 4yG6xI99NIPEVE9lNBXBKIlewIyVlkOaYvJWSV+p5gdJXOvScNN1epm5YHmf9aE2ZjnqZGoM
 Mtsyw18YoX9BqMFInxqYQQ3j/HpVgTSvmo5ea5qQDDUaCsaTf8UeDcwYOtgI8iL4oHcsGtUX
 oUk33HEAEQEAAcLAXwQYAQIACQUCTVkGzwIbDAAKCRAWmrexpM/4rrXiB/sGbkQ6itMrAIfn
 M7IbRuiSZS1unlySUVYu3SD6YBYnNi3G5EpbwfBNuT3H8//rVvtOFK4OD8cRYkxXRQmTvqa3
 3eDIHu/zr1HMKErm+2SD6PO9umRef8V82o2oaCLvf4WeIssFjwB0b6a12opuRP7yo3E3gTCS
 KmbUuLv1CtxKQF+fUV1cVaTPMyT25Od+RC1K+iOR0F54oUJvJeq7fUzbn/KdlhA8XPGzwGRy
 4zcsPWvwnXgfe5tk680fEKZVwOZKIEuJC3v+/yZpQzDvGYJvbyix0lHnrCzq43WefRHI5XTT
 QbM0WUIBIcGmq38+OgUsMYu4NzLu7uZFAcmp6h8g
Organization: Linaro Developer Services
In-Reply-To: <20240109230704.4120561-1-christianshewitt@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

On 10/01/2024 00:07, Christian Hewitt wrote:
> Playing 4K media with 59.94 fractional rate (typically VP9) causes the screen to lose
> sync with the following error reported in the system log:
> 
> [   89.610280] Fatal Error, invalid HDMI vclk freq 593406
> 
> Modetest shows the following:
> 
> 3840x2160 59.94 3840 4016 4104 4400 2160 2168 2178 2250 593407 flags: xxxx, xxxx,
> drm calculated value -------------------------------------^
> 
> Change the fractional rate calculation to stop DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST rounding down which
> results in vclk freq failing to match correctly.

Thanks for the patch, it may need to closely look what's would be the consequence
here, since /1000)*1000 would reduce comparison to less digits, but why ?

A good thing would be to find the offending commit of when this broke, or redo
the entire math because it looks super fishy a few years later...

What puzzles me is that the same calculation is done on both side:
- meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq() called from meson_encoder_hdmi_mode_valid()
- meson_vclk_setup() called from meson_encoder_hdmi_set_vclk() and meson_encoder_hdmi_atomic_enable()

so when a mode freq is selected from meson_encoder_hdmi_mode_valid(), it should match the
mode freq in meson_vclk_setup(), but no.
So why reducing precision makes this work ???

Neil

> 
> Fixes: e5fab2ec9ca4 ("drm/meson: vclk: add support for YUV420 setup")
> Signed-off-by: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>
> ---
> I'm unable to give a better mathematical description of the fix as I can barely read
> code. The change was inspired by [0] which I chanced upon while looking at how other
> dw-hdmi drivers handle fractional rates.
> 
> [0] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/4f510aa10468954b1da4e94689c38ac6ea8d3627
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> index 2a82119eb58e..2a942dc6a6dc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/meson/meson_vclk.c
> @@ -790,13 +790,13 @@ meson_vclk_vic_supported_freq(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int phy_freq,
>   				 FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].pixel_freq));
>   		DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("i = %d phy_freq = %d alt = %d\n",
>   				 i, params[i].phy_freq,
> -				 FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10);
> +				 FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000);
>   		/* Match strict frequency */
>   		if (phy_freq == params[i].phy_freq &&
>   		    vclk_freq == params[i].vclk_freq)
>   			return MODE_OK;
>   		/* Match 1000/1001 variant */
> -		if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/10)*10) &&
> +		if (phy_freq == (FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].phy_freq/1000)*1000) &&
>   		    vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[i].vclk_freq))
>   			return MODE_OK;
>   	}
> @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ void meson_vclk_setup(struct meson_drm *priv, unsigned int target,
>   
>   	for (freq = 0 ; params[freq].pixel_freq ; ++freq) {
>   		if ((phy_freq == params[freq].phy_freq ||
> -		     phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/10)*10) &&
> +		     phy_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].phy_freq/1000)*1000) &&
>   		    (vclk_freq == params[freq].vclk_freq ||
>   		     vclk_freq == FREQ_1000_1001(params[freq].vclk_freq))) {
>   			if (vclk_freq != params[freq].vclk_freq)