Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-22411-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1;
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>, "Paul E. McKenney"
 <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] allmodconfig build error in next-20240108
In-Reply-To: <6r2zjqbs2g3hkt3uhnglwpboalwck5ye34b6gxzmhe4gae77g7@3bzqt4s7i2qb>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
References: <45ad1d0f-a10f-483e-848a-76a30252edbe@paulmck-laptop>
 <20240109095757.1313b2d9@canb.auug.org.au>
 <341a4955-0cdd-48d0-bfbd-cc6f6f09df37@paulmck-laptop>
 <atbx7mspjbymkzgstk4l64qz3uky3wpmx4isrfg3ixgtvebdd2@cktpe4ejfk7k>
 <20240110081155.48bb0cbd@oak>
 <d61dfe52-9567-4f62-98f5-5c1e00cb4708@paulmck-laptop>
 <20240110095822.3ba3d979@canb.auug.org.au>
 <3d14049c-d44c-4b33-9933-0f96055b8a70@paulmck-laptop>
 <20240110160335.2bad7d54@oak>
 <3a10ef2b-acbe-4d80-805a-e947e15e5db3@paulmck-laptop>
 <6r2zjqbs2g3hkt3uhnglwpboalwck5ye34b6gxzmhe4gae77g7@3bzqt4s7i2qb>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:18:11 +0200
Message-ID: <87o7dtusi4.fsf@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> wrote:
> [ This particular warning is broken on GCC11. In future changes it will
>    be moved to the normal C flags in the top level Makefile (out of
>    Makefile.extrawarn), but accounting for the compiler support. Just
>    remove it out of xe's forced extra warnings for now ]
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>
> would you mind if I extend it to drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> in the same commit or would you prefer a separate one?

I think I'd prefer separate patches for i915 and xe. And just remove the
line instead of subdir-ccflags-$(call gcc-min-version, 120000) as
linux-next handles it properly in the top level Makefile.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel