Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-22595-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.48.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.48.161;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231223205813.32083-1-tintinm2017@gmail.com> <87o7eg607d.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
 <ZYpb6Woh45ZnEvCP@archie.me> <CAJjsb4reD_TVWRFonp90xXD4Ye2OOfOd894PzmfMKaP3qFkbYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87jzohoy02.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
In-Reply-To: <87jzohoy02.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
From: Attreyee M <tintinm2017@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 23:50:24 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJjsb4omO_0+EMBX-g1jnxUeYsPr=uWCtwHCxUjmLirdVAUGLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/livepatch: Update terminology in livepatch
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>, jpoimboe@kernel.org, jikos@kernel.org, 
	mbenes@suse.cz, pmladek@suse.com, joe.lawrence@redhat.com, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, 
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

As Bagas Sanjaya wrote in the email before about the change, I thought
the reason was explained.
I am sorry that I didn't respond to it thinking that.

Thank you
Attreyee Mukherjee

On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 23:45, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> Attreyee M <tintinm2017@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Hello maintainers,
> >
> > I wanted to ask if this patch of mine is accepted as of now.
>
> You never responded to the question that is still quoted in your
> (unfortunately top-posted) email:
>
> > So this is a classic example of saying what you have done, but not why.
> > What makes this a change that we want?
>
> So no, not accepted.  Even with a proper changelog, though, I'm not sure
> I see the value in that particular change.
>
> jon