Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23267-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 00:56:55 -0800
From: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, tony.luck@intel.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@linux.intel.com>,
	antonio.gomez.iglesias@linux.intel.com,
	Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH  v5 6/6] KVM: VMX: Move VERW closer to VMentry for MDS
 mitigation
Message-ID: <20240111-delay-verw-v5-6-a3b234933ea6@linux.intel.com>
References: <20240111-delay-verw-v5-0-a3b234933ea6@linux.intel.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240111-delay-verw-v5-0-a3b234933ea6@linux.intel.com>

During VMentry VERW is executed to mitigate MDS. After VERW, any memory
access like register push onto stack may put host data in MDS affected
CPU buffers. A guest can then use MDS to sample host data.

Although likelihood of secrets surviving in registers at current VERW
callsite is less, but it can't be ruled out. Harden the MDS mitigation
by moving the VERW mitigation late in VMentry path.

Note that VERW for MMIO Stale Data mitigation is unchanged because of
the complexity of per-guest conditional VERW which is not easy to handle
that late in asm with no GPRs available. If the CPU is also affected by
MDS, VERW is unconditionally executed late in asm regardless of guest
having MMIO access.

Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S |  3 +++
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c     | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
index b3b13ec04bac..139960deb736 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S
@@ -161,6 +161,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__vmx_vcpu_run)
 	/* Load guest RAX.  This kills the @regs pointer! */
 	mov VCPU_RAX(%_ASM_AX), %_ASM_AX
 
+	/* Clobbers EFLAGS.ZF */
+	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
+
 	/* Check EFLAGS.CF from the VMX_RUN_VMRESUME bit test above. */
 	jnc .Lvmlaunch
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index bdcf2c041e0c..8defba8e417b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -387,6 +387,17 @@ static __always_inline void vmx_enable_fb_clear(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 
 static void vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
 {
+	/*
+	 * FB_CLEAR_CTRL is to optimize VERW latency in guests when host is
+	 * affected by MMIO Stale Data, but not by MDS/TAA. When
+	 * X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF is enabled, system is likely affected by
+	 * MDS/TAA. Skip the optimization for such a case.
+	 */
+	if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF)) {
+		vmx->disable_fb_clear = false;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	vmx->disable_fb_clear = (host_arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR_CTRL) &&
 				!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) &&
 				!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA);
@@ -7226,11 +7237,14 @@ static noinstr void vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 
 	guest_state_enter_irqoff();
 
-	/* L1D Flush includes CPU buffer clear to mitigate MDS */
+	/*
+	 * L1D Flush includes CPU buffer clear to mitigate MDS, but VERW
+	 * mitigation for MDS is done late in VMentry and is still
+	 * executed in spite of L1D Flush. This is because an extra VERW
+	 * should not matter much after the big hammer L1D Flush.
+	 */
 	if (static_branch_unlikely(&vmx_l1d_should_flush))
 		vmx_l1d_flush(vcpu);
-	else if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_CPU_BUF))
-		mds_clear_cpu_buffers();
 	else if (static_branch_unlikely(&mmio_stale_data_clear) &&
 		 kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm))
 		mds_clear_cpu_buffers();

-- 
2.34.1