Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23572-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:16:06 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Cc: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
	Atish Kumar Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V
Message-ID: <ZZ_cBlOSW9VCjkOv@bogus>
References: <20240111093058.121838-1-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <20240111093058.121838-2-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com>
 <20240111-bb411d2dd39eb859dd049fa0@orel>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240111-bb411d2dd39eb859dd049fa0@orel>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 11:00:12AM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:

[...]

> Also, interestingly, it looks like this ancient line
>
>  obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR)    += processor.o
>
> in drivers/acpi/Makefile should be removed,

No

> since there's no drivers/acpi/processor.c file.

Correct, but ..

> I guess the make process silently filters object files which don't have
> corresponding source files?

May be, but I doubt if that is the case here.

processor.o is just aggregation of all processor_*.o and this will be
the processor.ko when built as a module.

--
Regards,
Sudeep