Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760713AbXLML64 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:58:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751114AbXLML6s (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:58:48 -0500 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:46992 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751006AbXLML6r (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:58:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 11:49:51 +0100 Message-ID: From: Takashi Iwai To: Theodore Tso Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Roland Dreier , perex@perex.cz Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc4-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.23 In-Reply-To: <20071209021544.GY17037@thunk.org> References: <200712080340.49546.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071208014241.f4b138e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071208194042.GO17037@thunk.org> <200712082330.54259.rjw@sisk.pl> <20071209021544.GY17037@thunk.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.5 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 MULE XEmacs/21.5 (beta28) (fuki) (+CVS-20070806) (i386-suse-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1535 Lines: 41 [Sorry for the late response as I've been on vacation] At Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:15:44 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:30:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Saturday, 8 of December 2007, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > However, as far as I am concerned, Ingo's patch, first posted to LKML > > > here: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/16/66 should be listed as fixing > > > the above regression. Rafael, could you please make a note of this in > > > your regression list, > > > > Done, thanks. > > Great, thanks. I should add that technically this wasn't a regression > since I had been seeing this since before 2.6.23. Also, it isn't a > big deal, since aside from noise in the syslog, falling back to > polling more doesn't make any functional or user-visible difference > (although I guess it's less efficient). > > Regardless of whether it is a regression, it would be nice to get the > patch applied and and this issue fixed for 2.6.25! You mean 2.6.24 ? ;-) Yes, if it solves the problem, not only improves the latency, it's definitely nice to have now. I was just too conservative to mark it for 2.6.24 merge although it looks safe. Jaroslav, could you prepare this for the push? It corresponds to alsa-kernel HG changeset 5557. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/