Received: by 2002:a05:7412:e794:b0:fa:551:50a7 with SMTP id o20csp1695587rdd; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGTWilcISBo7Yurmd/1SjQjCV/dsYmMHJZY0ywcu4QFqQ6ovvxLVukHmGM7NvZJi53R6VnL X-Received: by 2002:a50:fb08:0:b0:553:73c4:87db with SMTP id d8-20020a50fb08000000b0055373c487dbmr732612edq.15.1704984649911; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:49 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1704984649; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=QmccMsTwnI1B55sgz2ry0C1J1CJOIeQ3EfsIuCU5bCBPVJuw5pap+EWDBW7GAXVfMc vdCFCAXFChzXNibYiI+YvLQ4O+AIEsdGZ4FbjtOssbhH7mD16B6fqdLezrPfDJJK3RKn QSXLs8GZk8OsG+eas8c2A6r9BsAhf2yEnocBZ0kd5vytkooruGTywxVylzGcgCPYZAhk FgKAedphNwHen8Bht0GBg8wuO6QPrC02GiS/9qQV3QEO5Cvxaay25/rvN2NzEi0/Yprv lne2duYw8xo/P7UVPRldDkFdXXYwj+fXdn5Dt+2IZfbUNLbBWkE/3M7WB8pE4dzj4yCC 4IVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=bEyGSllYt9OxPetcB8D76c/PruL4Th1B1cxlxtL+brQ=; fh=sl+YvnCpPWmAq0jueywPuzqZT9DkzpqEdNFjK+zkHVw=; b=ynQqKKXzwd71lZeJis7n2btBmqNWvCo81t8a69A2Yr8HEk93qyi36x8IG/nB1lzYV7 JkVourj0xr0ZEh6RRLykGnkc2N4SWLP8yT48R94BI73dQ2i/+zQ67baKejIFeAoHlYd8 ZtTyJ9zSmdMIQH99btBIifeigRTUY9WJTdiKxE9qU+57cTnJgYL8Pm0ciPImB1UUoPa2 PUvJrtAoeTIwL1/m6w3ypz+AHs3frmpNdLmLGFazYKWKrp4D03u4P1fTzh+U1Du5WRwB WMASS34yo7hcrQGjJT9n+O86Y2U3N/aRCZxq4i40ptPEi61pYG4DpEwQlDGF8hP77Uq5 K4DA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=q4Rd2nzR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23731-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-23731-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Return-Path: Received: from am.mirrors.kernel.org (am.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:4601:e00::3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id eo11-20020a056402530b00b0055753ccea7fsi579662edb.127.2024.01.11.06.50.49 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23731-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=q4Rd2nzR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23731-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-23731-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by am.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CB231F24EC6 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300934CB25; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="q4Rd2nzR" Received: from mail-lf1-f43.google.com (mail-lf1-f43.google.com [209.85.167.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F4794A9A0 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 14:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us Received: by mail-lf1-f43.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-50eabfac2b7so6156950e87.0 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1704984615; x=1705589415; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bEyGSllYt9OxPetcB8D76c/PruL4Th1B1cxlxtL+brQ=; b=q4Rd2nzRzqb0LCvVFZGyTRYoUNIm9bZty5rEobxjYDQuq+b4AVrpEEI2dH4KeIaHro SysdjD1CBFXVG3fqVKKVfVrTfRkxZcAcd35BVo9wHZQcAojCujkpOURZK60wzTHgtTbf 9ranOxaEX9KAJXIzUVae/6kE2aJC/e3BDAke0qcZF7wg6MjxWHWgXKAvamWdA6DoSUUD O/926NNtNyjizKuhFl8Fnq8qzNgXBUHrpUPS5aU/6O+Q6CPkqzYdBvgaS6sczErd916U TUrlKOq74z3BC/Fr7M+5U6g4PAOk7OFhkWTm45FR74Oyrmf5Pl/um0FO0me8Q9vWPjig 64gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704984615; x=1705589415; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=bEyGSllYt9OxPetcB8D76c/PruL4Th1B1cxlxtL+brQ=; b=XTFpkG2TnPXFFWKjW1NhYhPTRHS4s730+9R19yDLbNsX59iXu49iWvVCjGJsjQRS1y dcGpeSXpT5FlBxVx/1wuf5o5QkQ6mV8ZsbULH/GsTIcRNBf+1Utpte1aS58D0cJbsDiP mYjOHkkCRDOjw1mDNByOVDmCcvB81rRuMrlAaMFt6BrnUnFeyyYGpdcgoumZLlsYkWaC 2HBKBKBwnmu56wGJNBtNpmnq5NG9cBKBWBed7CHnRUNlAcVvFwIU4KkkRskQQHQr1MPP sxza50/cjM9WPPgjRPbz+CTvuJKVyrjJDWvTxwBTuvGn2snMgBtozlTmszDy25CvPAeq /VdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxrDiJDwe9w1LK24M0kEdAfiyqnRAZ5UeQlef+e0fKltPHVFC03 UQJXD144tWGk1z/Aq0B52QZu2HchlE/hvA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:44a7:0:b0:50e:7709:a06e with SMTP id c7-20020ac244a7000000b0050e7709a06emr661289lfm.99.1704984615162; Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15-20020a1709066dcf00b00a2a6e8f693esm654747ejt.152.2024.01.11.06.50.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 11 Jan 2024 06:50:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 15:50:12 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Wen Gu Cc: wintera@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net/smc: implement loopback-ism used by SMC-D Message-ID: References: <20240111120036.109903-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240111120036.109903-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 01:00:21PM CET, guwen@linux.alibaba.com wrote: >This patch set acts as the second part of the new version of [1] (The first >part can be referred from [2]), the updated things of this version are listed >at the end. > ># Background > >SMC-D is now used in IBM z with ISM function to optimize network interconnect >for intra-CPC communications. Inspired by this, we try to make SMC-D available Care to provide more details about what ISM and intra-CPC is and what it it good for? >on the non-s390 architecture through a software-implemented virtual ISM device, >that is the loopback-ism device here, to accelerate inter-process or I see no such device. Is it a netdevice? If it is "software-implemented", why is it part of smc driver and not separate soft-device driver? If there is some smc specific code, I guess there should be some level of separation. Can't this be implemented by other devices too? >inter-containers communication within the same OS instance. > ># Design > >This patch set includes 3 parts: > > - Patch #1-#2: some prepare work for loopback-ism. > - Patch #3-#9: implement loopback-ism device. > - Patch #10-#15: memory copy optimization for loopback scenario. > >The loopback-ism device is designed as a ISMv2 device and not be limited to >a specific net namespace, ends of both inter-process connection (1/1' in diagram >below) or inter-container connection (2/2' in diagram below) can find the same >available loopback-ism and choose it during the CLC handshake. > > Container 1 (ns1) Container 2 (ns2) > +-----------------------------------------+ +-------------------------+ > | +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ | | +-------+ | > | | App A | | App B | | App C | | | | App D |<-+ | > | +-------+ +---^---+ +-------+ | | +-------+ |(2') | > | |127.0.0.1 (1')| |192.168.0.11 192.168.0.12| | > | (1)| +--------+ | +--------+ |(2) | | +--------+ +--------+ | > | `-->| lo |-` | eth0 |<-` | | | lo | | eth0 | | > +---------+--|---^-+---+-----|--+---------+ +-+--------+---+-^------+-+ > | | | | > Kernel | | | | > +----+-------v---+-----------v----------------------------------+---+----+ > | | TCP | | > | | | | > | +--------------------------------------------------------------+ | > | | > | +--------------+ | > | | smc loopback | | > +---------------------------+--------------+-----------------------------+ > >loopback-ism device creates DMBs (shared memory) for each connection peer. >Since data transfer occurs within the same kernel, the sndbuf of each peer >is only a descriptor and point to the same memory region as peer DMB, so that >the data copy from sndbuf to peer DMB can be avoided in loopback-ism case. > > Container 1 (ns1) Container 2 (ns2) > +-----------------------------------------+ +-------------------------+ > | +-------+ | | +-------+ | > | | App C |-----+ | | | App D | | > | +-------+ | | | +-^-----+ | > | | | | | | > | (2) | | | (2') | | > | | | | | | > +---------------|-------------------------+ +----------|--------------+ > | | > Kernel | | > +---------------|-----------------------------------------|--------------+ > | +--------+ +--v-----+ +--------+ +--------+ | > | |dmb_desc| |snd_desc| |dmb_desc| |snd_desc| | > | +-----|--+ +--|-----+ +-----|--+ +--------+ | > | +-----|--+ | +-----|--+ | > | | DMB C | +---------------------------------| DMB D | | > | +--------+ +--------+ | > | | > | +--------------+ | > | | smc loopback | | > +---------------------------+--------------+-----------------------------+ > ># Benchmark Test > > * Test environments: > - VM with Intel Xeon Platinum 8 core 2.50GHz, 16 GiB mem. > - SMC sndbuf/DMB size 1MB. > - /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_copy is set to default 0, > which means sndbuf and DMB are merged and no data copied between them. > - /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_type is set to default 0, Exposing any configuration knobs and statistics over sysfs for softdevices does not look correct at all :/ Could you please avoid sysfs? > which means DMB is physically contiguous buffer. > > * Test object: > - TCP: run on TCP loopback. > - SMC lo: run on SMC loopback device. > >1. ipc-benchmark (see [3]) > > - ./ -c 1000000 -s 100 > > TCP SMC-lo >Message >rate (msg/s) 80636 149515(+85.42%) > >2. sockperf > > - serv: taskset -c sockperf sr --tcp > - clnt: taskset -c sockperf { tp | pp } --tcp --msg-size={ 64000 for tp | 14 for pp } -i 127.0.0.1 -t 30 > > TCP SMC-lo >Bandwidth(MBps) 4909.36 8197.57(+66.98%) >Latency(us) 6.098 3.383(-44.52%) > >3. nginx/wrk > > - serv: nginx > - clnt: wrk -t 8 -c 1000 -d 30 http://127.0.0.1:80 > > TCP SMC-lo >Requests/s 181685.74 246447.77(+35.65%) > >4. redis-benchmark > > - serv: redis-server > - clnt: redis-benchmark -h 127.0.0.1 -q -t set,get -n 400000 -c 200 -d 1024 > > TCP SMC-lo >GET(Requests/s) 85855.34 118553.64(+38.09%) >SET(Requests/s) 86824.40 125944.58(+45.06%) > > >Change log: > >v1->RFC: >- Patch #9: merge rx_bytes and tx_bytes as xfer_bytes statistics: > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/xfer_bytes >- Patch #10: add support_dmb_nocopy operation to check if SMC-D device supports > merging sndbuf with peer DMB. >- Patch #13 & #14: introduce loopback-ism device control of DMB memory type and > control of whether to merge sndbuf and DMB. They can be respectively set by: > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_type > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_copy > The motivation for these two control is that a performance bottleneck was > found when using vzalloced DMB and sndbuf is merged with DMB, and there are > many CPUs and CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is set [4]. The bottleneck is caused > by the lock contention in vmap_area_lock [5] which is involved in memcpy_from_msg() > or memcpy_to_msg(). Currently, Uladzislau Rezki is working on mitigating the > vmap lock contention [6]. It has significant effects, but using virtual memory > still has additional overhead compared to using physical memory. > So this new version provides controls of dmb_type and dmb_copy to suit > different scenarios. >- Some minor changes and comments improvements. > >RFC->old version([1]): >Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1702214654-32069-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >- Patch #1: improve the loopback-ism dump, it shows as follows now: > # smcd d > FID Type PCI-ID PCHID InUse #LGs PNET-ID > 0000 0 loopback-ism ffff No 0 >- Patch #3: introduce the smc_ism_set_v2_capable() helper and set > smc_ism_v2_capable when ISMv2 or virtual ISM is registered, > regardless of whether there is already a device in smcd device list. >- Patch #3: loopback-ism will be added into /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/. >- Patch #8: introduce the runtime switch /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/active > to activate or deactivate the loopback-ism. >- Patch #9: introduce the statistics of loopback-ism by > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/{{tx|rx}_tytes|dmbs_cnt}. >- Some minor changes and comments improvements. > >[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1695568613-125057-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231219142616.80697-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >[3] https://github.com/goldsborough/ipc-bench >[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3189e342-c38f-6076-b730-19a6efd732a5@linux.alibaba.com/ >[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/238e63cd-e0e8-4fbf-852f-bc4d5bc35d5a@linux.alibaba.com/ >[6] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240102184633.748113-1-urezki@gmail.com/ > >Wen Gu (15): > net/smc: improve SMC-D device dump for virtual ISM > net/smc: decouple specialized struct from SMC-D DMB registration > net/smc: introduce virtual ISM device loopback-ism > net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism > net/smc: implement some unsupported operations of loopback-ism > net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback-ism > net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism runtime switch > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism statistics attributes > net/smc: add operations to merge sndbuf with peer DMB > net/smc: attach or detach ghost sndbuf to peer DMB > net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism DMB type control > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism DMB data copy control > net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism > > drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 2 +- > include/net/smc.h | 7 +- > net/smc/Kconfig | 13 + > net/smc/Makefile | 2 +- > net/smc/af_smc.c | 28 +- > net/smc/smc_cdc.c | 58 ++- > net/smc/smc_cdc.h | 1 + > net/smc/smc_core.c | 61 +++- > net/smc/smc_core.h | 1 + > net/smc/smc_ism.c | 71 +++- > net/smc/smc_ism.h | 5 + > net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 718 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 88 +++++ > 13 files changed, 1026 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_loopback.c > create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_loopback.h > >-- >2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f > >