Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-23851-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 147.75.199.223 as permitted sender) client-ip=147.75.199.223;
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:19:15 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/24] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard
 definition for local_lock.
Message-ID: <20240111161915.QlfL1DLS@linutronix.de>
References: <20231215171020.687342-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <20231215171020.687342-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
 <e6509e106251c10a9f65bf5e520911cda26060a6.camel@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e6509e106251c10a9f65bf5e520911cda26060a6.camel@redhat.com>

On 2023-12-18 09:16:49 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > @@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
> >  #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
> >  	__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
> >  
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
> > +		    local_lock(_T->lock),
> > +		    local_unlock(_T->lock))
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
> > +		    local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
> > +		    local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
> 
> DEFINE_GUARD should fit for the 2 above, right?

Yes, that will work. Let me update it.

> Cheers,
> 
> Paolo

Sebastian