Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-25540-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Message-ID: <tencent_817CE182D5DA478E3FB85831A621778D0008@qq.com>
From: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
To: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>,
	Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] RISC-V: mm: only test mmap without hint
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 03:58:31 +0800
In-Reply-To: <tencent_F3B3B5AB1C9D704763CA423E1A41F8BE0509@qq.com>
References: <tencent_F3B3B5AB1C9D704763CA423E1A41F8BE0509@qq.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The original test from a patch violates the principle of mmap which uses
mmap hint address as the largest address space to use rather than where to
create the mapping. The address space in this context is either sv39, sv48,
sv57.

After fixing the correct behavior, only keeping the test mmap without a
hint is enough.

Signed-off-by: Yangyu Chen <cyy@cyyself.name>
---
 .../selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_bottomup.c        | 12 --------
 .../testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_default.c | 12 --------
 tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h  | 30 -------------------
 3 files changed, 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_bottomup.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_bottomup.c
index 1757d19ca89b..1ba703d3f552 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_bottomup.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_bottomup.c
@@ -15,20 +15,8 @@ TEST(infinite_rlimit)
 	do_mmaps(&mmap_addresses);
 
 	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.no_hint);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_37_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_38_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_46_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_47_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_55_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_56_addr);
 
 	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.no_hint);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_37_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_38_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_46_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_47_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_55_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 56, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_56_addr);
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_default.c b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_default.c
index c63c60b9397e..f1ac860dcf04 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_default.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_default.c
@@ -15,20 +15,8 @@ TEST(default_rlimit)
 	do_mmaps(&mmap_addresses);
 
 	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.no_hint);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_37_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_38_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_46_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_47_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_55_addr);
-	EXPECT_NE(MAP_FAILED, mmap_addresses.on_56_addr);
 
 	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.no_hint);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_37_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_38_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 38, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_46_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_47_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 47, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_55_addr);
-	EXPECT_GT(1UL << 56, (unsigned long)mmap_addresses.on_56_addr);
 #endif
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
index 2e0db9c5be6c..d2271426288f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/riscv/mm/mmap_test.h
@@ -10,47 +10,17 @@
 
 struct addresses {
 	int *no_hint;
-	int *on_37_addr;
-	int *on_38_addr;
-	int *on_46_addr;
-	int *on_47_addr;
-	int *on_55_addr;
-	int *on_56_addr;
 };
 
 // Only works on 64 bit
 #if __riscv_xlen == 64
 static inline void do_mmaps(struct addresses *mmap_addresses)
 {
-	/*
-	 * Place all of the hint addresses on the boundaries of mmap
-	 * sv39, sv48, sv57
-	 * User addresses end at 1<<38, 1<<47, 1<<56 respectively
-	 */
-	void *on_37_bits = (void *)(1UL << 37);
-	void *on_38_bits = (void *)(1UL << 38);
-	void *on_46_bits = (void *)(1UL << 46);
-	void *on_47_bits = (void *)(1UL << 47);
-	void *on_55_bits = (void *)(1UL << 55);
-	void *on_56_bits = (void *)(1UL << 56);
-
 	int prot = PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE;
 	int flags = MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS;
 
 	mmap_addresses->no_hint =
 		mmap(NULL, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_37_addr =
-		mmap(on_37_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_38_addr =
-		mmap(on_38_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_46_addr =
-		mmap(on_46_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_47_addr =
-		mmap(on_47_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_55_addr =
-		mmap(on_55_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
-	mmap_addresses->on_56_addr =
-		mmap(on_56_bits, 5 * sizeof(int), prot, flags, 0, 0);
 }
 #endif /* __riscv_xlen == 64 */
 
-- 
2.43.0