Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1765064AbXLMUWl (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:22:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755770AbXLMUWc (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:22:32 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:33789 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751641AbXLMUWa (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:22:30 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:21:26 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Kay Sievers Cc: vincent.fortier1@ec.gc.ca, Dhaval Giani , Greg KH , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Balbir Singh , maneesh@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: 2.6.22.14 oops msg with commvault galaxy ? Message-ID: <20071213202125.GA25130@elte.hu> References: <1197554397.19869.3.camel@lov.site> <1197558120.4936.34.camel@kayak.wul.qc.ec.gc.ca> <1197562981.19869.5.camel@lov.site> <20071213165059.GC4865@elte.hu> <1197565842.19869.11.camel@lov.site> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1197565842.19869.11.camel@lov.site> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1244 Lines: 30 * Kay Sievers wrote: > > > > This one also fails to apply properly at the exact same place > > > > has Ingo's previously posted patch. Would need to backport his > > > > one. > > > > > > It depends on a completely reworked sysfs logic, I don't think it > > > makes any sense to backport that. > > > > well, if it fixes a live bug in a still supported stable kernel > > release... > > > > Vincent, could you try to just get rid of all actual uses of > > se->attr.owner, within fs/sysfs/*.c? Something like the patch below. > > (totally untested - might be fatally broken as well) > > How can you think that this is not needed? You can not remove it with > sysfs you are patching. Hope this explains it: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=0ab66088c855eca68513bdd7442a426c4b374ced yeah - as i said it might be fatally broken (in fact it is). Do we understand why Vincent got the crashes with vanilla 2.6.22.14 ? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/