Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932873AbXLMUnt (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:43:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932774AbXLMUnK (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:43:10 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:55724 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1765910AbXLMUnH (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Dec 2007 15:43:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:42:19 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Gautham R Shenoy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Paul E McKenney , Dipankar Sarma , Ted Tso , dvhltc@us.ibm.com, Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , bunk@kernel.org, Josh Triplett , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] RCU: Preemptible-RCU Message-ID: <20071213204219.GF25130@elte.hu> References: <20071213170348.GA25981@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1305 Lines: 36 * Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Gautham R Shenoy wrote: > > > > > Currently it is based against the latest linux-2.6-sched-devel.git > > > > Awaiting your feedback! > > Hi Gautham, > > Thanks for posting this. I believe this is the same version of preempt > RCU as we have in the RT patch. It seems to be very stable. I ran the > RT patch version of the RCU Preempt (just the Preempt RCU patches > without RT on latest git) on a 64way box and the results seems just as > good (if not slightly better) than classic RCU! I'll rerun this patch > series on that box and post the results. > > >From what I'm seening with this, is that it is ready for mainline. > >These > patches should probably go into -mm and be ready for 2.6.25. If Andrew > wants to wait for my results, I'll run them tonight. > > Thanks Gautham, Paul and Dipankar for all this great work! Steve, if you went with a fine comb over the code and have done a thorough review, could you send me your Reviewed-by line for this patchset? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/