Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26056-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:4601:e00::3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:4601:e00::3;
From: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier
	<mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
        Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
        Rob
 Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
CC: <linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <op-tee@lists.trustedfirmware.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] remoteproc: stm32: Add support of an OP-TEE TA to load the firmware
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:52:49 +0100
Message-ID: <20240115135249.296822-5-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240115135249.296822-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
References: <20240115135249.296822-1-arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain

The new TEE remoteproc device is used to manage remote firmware in a
secure, trusted context. The 'st,stm32mp1-m4-tee' compatibility is
introduced to delegate the loading of the firmware to the trusted
execution context. In such cases, the firmware should be signed and
adhere to the image format defined by the TEE.

Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@foss.st.com>
---
 drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig       |   3 +-
 drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 149 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
index 85299606806c..e5bb675b5fc5 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
@@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ config STM32_RPROC
 	depends on ARCH_STM32 || COMPILE_TEST
 	depends on REMOTEPROC
 	select MAILBOX
+	select TEE_REMOTEPROC
 	help
 	  Say y here to support STM32 MCU processors via the
 	  remote processor framework.
@@ -367,7 +368,7 @@ config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
 
 
 config TEE_REMOTEPROC
-	tristate "trusted firmware support by a TEE application"
+	tristate "trusted firmware support by a trusted application"
 	depends on OPTEE
 	help
 	  Support for trusted remote processors firmware. The firmware
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
index fcc0001e2657..16dcf36ceeb6 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
 #include <linux/reset.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/tee_remoteproc.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 
 #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
@@ -49,6 +50,9 @@
 #define M4_STATE_STANDBY	4
 #define M4_STATE_CRASH		5
 
+/* Remote processor unique identifier aligned with the Trusted Execution Environment definitions */
+#define STM32_MP1_M4_PROC_ID    0
+
 struct stm32_syscon {
 	struct regmap *map;
 	u32 reg;
@@ -90,6 +94,8 @@ struct stm32_rproc {
 	struct stm32_mbox mb[MBOX_NB_MBX];
 	struct workqueue_struct *workqueue;
 	bool hold_boot_smc;
+	bool fw_loaded;
+	struct tee_rproc *trproc;
 	void __iomem *rsc_va;
 };
 
@@ -257,6 +263,91 @@ static int stm32_rproc_release(struct rproc *rproc)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_elf_sanity_check(struct rproc *rproc,
+					    const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	unsigned int ret = 0;
+
+	if (rproc->state == RPROC_DETACHED)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = tee_rproc_load_fw(ddata->trproc, fw);
+	if (!ret)
+		ddata->fw_loaded = true;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_elf_load(struct rproc *rproc,
+				    const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	unsigned int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * This function can be called by remote proc for recovery
+	 * without the sanity check. In this case we need to load the firmware
+	 * else nothing done here as the firmware has been preloaded for the
+	 * sanity check to be able to parse it for the resource table.
+	 */
+	if (ddata->fw_loaded)
+		return 0;
+
+	ret = tee_rproc_load_fw(ddata->trproc, fw);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+	ddata->fw_loaded = true;
+
+	/* Update the resource table parameters. */
+	if (rproc_tee_get_rsc_table(ddata->trproc)) {
+		/* No resource table: reset the related fields. */
+		rproc->cached_table = NULL;
+		rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
+		rproc->table_sz = 0;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct resource_table *
+stm32_rproc_tee_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
+					  const struct firmware *fw)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+
+	return tee_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table(ddata->trproc);
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_start(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+
+	return tee_rproc_start(ddata->trproc);
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_attach(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	/* Nothing to do, remote proc already started by the secured context. */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int stm32_rproc_tee_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	int err;
+
+	stm32_rproc_request_shutdown(rproc);
+
+	err = tee_rproc_stop(ddata->trproc);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	ddata->fw_loaded = false;
+
+	return stm32_rproc_release(rproc);
+}
+
 static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 {
 	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
@@ -319,7 +410,14 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
 
 static int stm32_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
 {
-	if (rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw))
+	struct stm32_rproc *ddata = rproc->priv;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (ddata->trproc)
+		ret = rproc_tee_get_rsc_table(ddata->trproc);
+	else
+		ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
+	if (ret)
 		dev_warn(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found for this firmware\n");
 
 	return 0;
@@ -693,8 +791,22 @@ static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_ops = {
 	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
 };
 
+static const struct rproc_ops st_rproc_tee_ops = {
+	.prepare	= stm32_rproc_prepare,
+	.start		= stm32_rproc_tee_start,
+	.stop		= stm32_rproc_tee_stop,
+	.attach		= stm32_rproc_tee_attach,
+	.kick		= stm32_rproc_kick,
+	.parse_fw	= stm32_rproc_parse_fw,
+	.find_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_tee_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
+	.get_loaded_rsc_table = stm32_rproc_get_loaded_rsc_table,
+	.sanity_check	= stm32_rproc_tee_elf_sanity_check,
+	.load		= stm32_rproc_tee_elf_load,
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id stm32_rproc_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4" },
+	{.compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4",},
+	{.compatible = "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee",},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_rproc_match);
@@ -853,6 +965,7 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct stm32_rproc *ddata;
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	struct tee_rproc *trproc;
 	struct rproc *rproc;
 	unsigned int state;
 	int ret;
@@ -861,11 +974,31 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name, &st_rproc_ops, NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
-	if (!rproc)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee")) {
+		trproc = tee_rproc_register(dev, STM32_MP1_M4_PROC_ID);
+		if (IS_ERR(trproc)) {
+			dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(trproc),
+				      "signed firmware not supported by TEE\n");
+			return PTR_ERR(trproc);
+		}
+		/*
+		 * Delegate the firmware management to the secure context.
+		 * The firmware loaded has to be signed.
+		 */
+		dev_info(dev, "Support of signed firmware only\n");
+	}
+	rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, np->name,
+			    trproc ? &st_rproc_tee_ops : &st_rproc_ops,
+			    NULL, sizeof(*ddata));
+	if (!rproc) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto free_tee;
+	}
 
 	ddata = rproc->priv;
+	ddata->trproc = trproc;
+	if (trproc)
+		trproc->rproc = rproc;
 
 	rproc_coredump_set_elf_info(rproc, ELFCLASS32, EM_NONE);
 
@@ -916,6 +1049,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
 	}
 	rproc_free(rproc);
+free_tee:
+	if (trproc)
+		tee_rproc_unregister(trproc);
+
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -937,6 +1074,8 @@ static void stm32_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		device_init_wakeup(dev, false);
 	}
 	rproc_free(rproc);
+	if (ddata->trproc)
+		tee_rproc_unregister(ddata->trproc);
 }
 
 static int stm32_rproc_suspend(struct device *dev)
-- 
2.25.1