Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26071-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:06:29 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>,
	Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>, Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] erofs: Don't use certain internal folio_*()
 functions
Message-ID: <ZaU75cT0jx9Ya+6G@casper.infradead.org>
References: <20240115083337.1355191-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20240115083337.1355191-1-hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 04:33:37PM +0800, Gao Xiang wrote:
> From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> 
> Filesystems should use folio->index and folio->mapping, instead of
> folio_index(folio), folio_mapping() and folio_file_mapping() since
> they know that it's in the pagecache.
> 
> Change this automagically with:
> 
> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/erofs/*.c
> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_file_mapping[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->mapping/g' fs/erofs/*.c
> perl -p -i -e 's/folio_index[(]([^)]*)[)]/\1->index/g' fs/erofs/*.c
> 
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> Cc: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> Cc: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> Hi folks,
> 
> I tend to apply this patch upstream since compressed data fscache
> adaption touches this part too.  If there is no objection, I'm
> going to take this patch separately for -next shortly..

Could you change the subject?  It's not that the functions are
"internal", it's that filesystems don't need to use them because they're
guaranteed to not see swap pages.  Maybe just s/internal/unnecessary/

> Thanks,
> Gao Xiang
> 
> Change since v1:
>  - a better commit message pointed out by Jeff Layton.
> 
>  fs/erofs/fscache.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/erofs/fscache.c b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> index 87ff35bff8d5..bc12030393b2 100644
> --- a/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> +++ b/fs/erofs/fscache.c
> @@ -165,10 +165,10 @@ static int erofs_fscache_read_folios_async(struct fscache_cookie *cookie,
>  static int erofs_fscache_meta_read_folio(struct file *data, struct folio *folio)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> -	struct erofs_fscache *ctx = folio_mapping(folio)->host->i_private;
> +	struct erofs_fscache *ctx = folio->mapping->host->i_private;
>  	struct erofs_fscache_request *req;
>  
> -	req = erofs_fscache_req_alloc(folio_mapping(folio),
> +	req = erofs_fscache_req_alloc(folio->mapping,
>  				folio_pos(folio), folio_size(folio));
>  	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>  		folio_unlock(folio);
> @@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ static int erofs_fscache_read_folio(struct file *file, struct folio *folio)
>  	struct erofs_fscache_request *req;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	req = erofs_fscache_req_alloc(folio_mapping(folio),
> +	req = erofs_fscache_req_alloc(folio->mapping,
>  			folio_pos(folio), folio_size(folio));
>  	if (IS_ERR(req)) {
>  		folio_unlock(folio);
> -- 
> 2.39.3
>