Received: by 2002:a05:7412:8d11:b0:fa:4934:9f with SMTP id bj17csp554887rdb; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFuj5abuSG0CEY2dBmJwd+709/Kw2V4RyyHxdWa2idfmCJMNX8ArXS/6Qn5iKpnCdxqStXQ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6808:140f:b0:3bc:31dd:ce90 with SMTP id w15-20020a056808140f00b003bc31ddce90mr3713125oiv.15.1705327896395; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1705327896; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VUB+67YPXA4JDpVCsFfM9NSrIw2oSDcaJdSR2bhxc/HXOjMD8/UXFFEYrbIG1AhVl6 6BCdU+nK2883pjPJ8w7BJzf7x0F0osZ6rGb1HQklNWTsGkkvkBSTkEoK3hOrA2PeGPWL mQLC2svE2muUokoWr1owZjiHrrxnFD7keFMUzom69KHcIVx/GLL7EDp30jx3GbiaSP0b r+E9EkvJ7m8iOAgyldDYIf7ObzTWnwovY3V8qa/Ffi0ZYoMJZg+oBemS15Q2L6cAfqQE 7jMhNtyACaIkYL1dynGciUgnMDiX11Gr6przKnzBzIwqWdd5coYcY8LXOrchEeWWV3Jo qlGQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:list-unsubscribe :list-subscribe:list-id:precedence:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=nEW8TVJOCkMKaJNej4PCDNmTXZ9hZKRmiCLW8yVU9wQ=; fh=sl+YvnCpPWmAq0jueywPuzqZT9DkzpqEdNFjK+zkHVw=; b=FlEMVzb75MD8jGvHgxDomXc7rMkztHbhoteZLIdUzX5Ntjkl6uZx5HeNCnLBZ4byh7 EDyLMSXg8gYlAFR2bkIBxPDgZ8I0bb2VkRl3UExTVsYzsuCMih8vaCmlWprM8BEv3QLJ fre9fpRYUcCmj/zVh+Szv8X/7eSiF4/2Y7xQt4j3uaVyWDxqdqBEkB5AUyyAxLaKutVm Ux4j/R52TpJcNvKA2xtr/B2badct0vLvQ99VfoOU0Tk2qrB416y3ck+tXHWeingdciub B8R4WviKdsv28KdvKHm7owZ0fSoXzJC4vpIH7Zcyh9lkroxIjw+q8DeQ2QvEXNZF8VTV 1wcw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=TjWB3v79; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-26075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Return-Path: Received: from ny.mirrors.kernel.org (ny.mirrors.kernel.org. [2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h27-20020a05620a13fb00b00783245e9362si7834828qkl.622.2024.01.15.06.11.36 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=TjWB3v79; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45d1:ec00::1 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="linux-kernel+bounces-26075-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org" Received: from smtp.subspace.kernel.org (wormhole.subspace.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ny.mirrors.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 149221C2194F for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C99051759B; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:11:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="TjWB3v79" Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3AF717584 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 14:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=resnulli.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=resnulli.us Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-40e760e5b49so11941465e9.1 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1705327879; x=1705932679; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=nEW8TVJOCkMKaJNej4PCDNmTXZ9hZKRmiCLW8yVU9wQ=; b=TjWB3v79d0iF2khZv3pGateoaF8pV7aV+wk7Txx3g5r8um9oSyPx2nizdac0lB7xPT hlrQznkjFaqmpBHAFkPVtk55S8ojcXtsEsmSOL+6Cp1SVEdTzeDIWuse36Cv3HCPDIoe 119Uw+lYGrkhL+oXzq+F5JSbhBG0ABjC2uml8+bnHFmLGXnCdRbVpRW8LIwlKGH/Mjne nXCqYqeEDpxvSTuKPjBwvleiU71NW0YjomqunoBNLIGuyzQseQC3TLr5pLsTj78zYrAZ dlpNYGr7UUKAatBgKClP0cjqdbMnSFMt5AGSIa4xORmCzP0FOBylBGeO9hkcm2Mkq28b NW+Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705327879; x=1705932679; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=nEW8TVJOCkMKaJNej4PCDNmTXZ9hZKRmiCLW8yVU9wQ=; b=HGpCPyFFWu5WdO7kEMlsneuuzoMdAJVhRgNunsUe/Osqfr1kfskRlXyCpD/RT7MbD+ QAa0Rekjg1hYJGXtVMIOwVP90uNz65j8xPWfVGmMwm4T4J+s4M8htBflp25LuQN1a4Lk wU1IRYzTi2eZfTQSvRn0k1ad77W5e5tALw4aIveYZs6s8FGTXr6N7DOy1tWPHs+ytDM4 LRHHXHuk2sOcGwLW9XCk0Z540W5bc4fiJjTVRqq33oW0VyqjaQ9wuf0hRtptC4a86o9U +P//qMQhcwy0ZbQ6CPwa+mgk0G5aA8D3pM4tR8oGBOopbDfh8KjD6sRYgDfALWo+Q2C1 iEVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzNvaiDBDkRAFrfKb7gdeY7B0eWExwWdOxBZ40BZyH5ys3lx75N Cy7f+0O5TR5PbvMG04AVFT/GGpUKT+VC5A== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd85:0:b0:40e:5b2d:cd5d with SMTP id y5-20020a7bcd85000000b0040e5b2dcd5dmr2018793wmj.35.1705327878797; Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (host-213-179-129-39.customer.m-online.net. [213.179.129.39]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay12-20020a05600c1e0c00b0040d802a7619sm20287679wmb.38.2024.01.15.06.11.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 15 Jan 2024 06:11:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 15:11:16 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: Wen Gu Cc: wintera@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/15] net/smc: implement loopback-ism used by SMC-D Message-ID: References: <20240111120036.109903-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com> <2d8e7aeb-06da-434c-b7fe-6c1bd2e0674a@linux.alibaba.com> <895a0da3-bf6c-4e76-a672-d73481b4e58b@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <895a0da3-bf6c-4e76-a672-d73481b4e58b@linux.alibaba.com> Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 10:22:15AM CET, guwen@linux.alibaba.com wrote: > > >On 2024/1/12 23:50, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 01:32:14PM CET, guwen@linux.alibaba.com wrote: >> > >> > >> > On 2024/1/12 17:10, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> > > Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 09:29:35AM CET, guwen@linux.alibaba.com wrote: >> > > > > ><...> > >> > > > > > # Benchmark Test >> > > > > > >> > > > > > * Test environments: >> > > > > > - VM with Intel Xeon Platinum 8 core 2.50GHz, 16 GiB mem. >> > > > > > - SMC sndbuf/DMB size 1MB. >> > > > > > - /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_copy is set to default 0, >> > > > > > which means sndbuf and DMB are merged and no data copied between them. >> > > > > > - /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_type is set to default 0, >> > > > > >> > > > > Exposing any configuration knobs and statistics over sysfs for >> > > > > softdevices does not look correct at all :/ Could you please avoid >> > > > > sysfs? >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > In previous reviews and calls, we think loopback-ism needs to be more >> > > > like a device and be visible under /sys/devices. >> > > > >> > > > Would you mind explaining why using sysfs for loopback-ism is not correct? >> > > > since I saw some other configurations or statistics exists under /sys/devices, >> > > > e.g. /sys/devices/virtual/net/lo. Thank you! >> > > >> > > You have smc_netlink.c exposing clear netlink api for the subsystem. >> > > Can't you extend it to contain the configuration knobs and expose stats >> > > instead of sysfs? >> > > >> > >> > Thank you for the suggestion. I've also considered this approach. >> > >> > But I didn't choose to extend the smc netlink because for now smc netlink >> > are used for SMC protocol related attributes, for example: >> > >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_SYS_INFO: SMC version, release, v2-capable.. >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_LGR_SMC{R|D}: SMC-{R|D} link group inform (lgr id, lgr conn num, lgr role..) >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_LINK_SMCR: SMC-R link inform (link id, link state, conn cnt..) >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_DEV_SMCD: SMC-D device generic inform (user cnt, pci_fid, pci_chid, pci_vendor..) >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_DEV_SMCR: SMC-R device generic inform (dev name, port pnet_id, port valid, port state..) >> > SMC_NETLINK_GET_STATS: SMC generic stats (RMB cnt, Tx size, Rx size, RMB size...) >> > >> > And the knobs and stats in this patchset are loopback-ism device specific >> > attributes, for example: >> > >> > active: loopback-ism runtime switch >> > dmb_type: type of DMB provided by loopback-ism >> > dmb_copy: support for DMB merge of loopback-ism >> > xfer_bytes: data transferred by loopback-ism >> > dmbs_cnt: DMB num provided by loopback-ism >> > >> > The layer will be: >> > >> > +--------------------------------------+ >> > | | >> > | SMC protocol | >> > | (attrs by netlink in smc_netlink.c) | >> > | | >> > +--------------------------------------+ >> > ------------------smcd_ops------------------ >> > +---------------+ +---------------------+ +--------------+ >> > | loopback-ism | | s390 firmware ISM | | Possible | >> > +---------------+ | | | other | >> > (attrs by sysfs | | | virtual ISM | >> > in smc_loopback.c) | | | | >> > | | | | >> > +---------------------+ +--------------+ >> >> So nest it: >> SMC_NETLINK_BACKEND_GET_INFO >> SMC_NETLINK_BACKEND_GET_STATS >> ? >> I mean, isn't it better to have the backend knobs and stats in one place >> under same netlink commands and attributes than random sysfs path ? >> >Thank you for suggestion. > >I think it is not about nesting or gathering knobs and stats. It is >about not coupling underlying device details to upper layer SMC stack. > >From SMC perspective, it cares about the abstract operations defined >by smcd_ops, regardless of which underlying devices provide these >functions and how they provide. So IMO the details or configurations >of underlying devices shouldn't be involved in SMC. So you rather keep the device configuration and info exposed over random sysfs files? Sorry, that makes not sense to me. > >Besides, the knobs and stats here are specific for loopback-ism device, >they include runtime switch, buffer type choice and mode choice of >loopback-ism (basically they won't change after being set once). The >other kinds of devices used by SMC-D, e.g. s390 firmware ISM or other >virtual ISMs have no similar things. Okay, it is normal that different drivers implement different parts of UAPI. No problem. > >So I prefer to keep the current solution instead of expanding upper >layer SMC netlink. Makes no sense to me. This is UAPI from 20 years ago. Is this a time machine? > >Thanks, >Wen Gu > >> >> >> > >> > So I choose to use current way to provide this lower layer loopback-ism >> > device's attributes, restrict loopback-ism specific code to smc_loopback.c >> > and try to make a clear layer architecture. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Wen Gu >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Thanks again, >> > > > Wen Gu >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > which means DMB is physically contiguous buffer. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > * Test object: >> > > > > > - TCP: run on TCP loopback. >> > > > > > - SMC lo: run on SMC loopback device. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 1. ipc-benchmark (see [3]) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - ./ -c 1000000 -s 100 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > TCP SMC-lo >> > > > > > Message >> > > > > > rate (msg/s) 80636 149515(+85.42%) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 2. sockperf >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - serv: taskset -c sockperf sr --tcp >> > > > > > - clnt: taskset -c sockperf { tp | pp } --tcp --msg-size={ 64000 for tp | 14 for pp } -i 127.0.0.1 -t 30 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > TCP SMC-lo >> > > > > > Bandwidth(MBps) 4909.36 8197.57(+66.98%) >> > > > > > Latency(us) 6.098 3.383(-44.52%) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 3. nginx/wrk >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - serv: nginx >> > > > > > - clnt: wrk -t 8 -c 1000 -d 30 http://127.0.0.1:80 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > TCP SMC-lo >> > > > > > Requests/s 181685.74 246447.77(+35.65%) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > 4. redis-benchmark >> > > > > > >> > > > > > - serv: redis-server >> > > > > > - clnt: redis-benchmark -h 127.0.0.1 -q -t set,get -n 400000 -c 200 -d 1024 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > TCP SMC-lo >> > > > > > GET(Requests/s) 85855.34 118553.64(+38.09%) >> > > > > > SET(Requests/s) 86824.40 125944.58(+45.06%) >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Change log: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > v1->RFC: >> > > > > > - Patch #9: merge rx_bytes and tx_bytes as xfer_bytes statistics: >> > > > > > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/xfer_bytes >> > > > > > - Patch #10: add support_dmb_nocopy operation to check if SMC-D device supports >> > > > > > merging sndbuf with peer DMB. >> > > > > > - Patch #13 & #14: introduce loopback-ism device control of DMB memory type and >> > > > > > control of whether to merge sndbuf and DMB. They can be respectively set by: >> > > > > > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_type >> > > > > > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/dmb_copy >> > > > > > The motivation for these two control is that a performance bottleneck was >> > > > > > found when using vzalloced DMB and sndbuf is merged with DMB, and there are >> > > > > > many CPUs and CONFIG_HARDENED_USERCOPY is set [4]. The bottleneck is caused >> > > > > > by the lock contention in vmap_area_lock [5] which is involved in memcpy_from_msg() >> > > > > > or memcpy_to_msg(). Currently, Uladzislau Rezki is working on mitigating the >> > > > > > vmap lock contention [6]. It has significant effects, but using virtual memory >> > > > > > still has additional overhead compared to using physical memory. >> > > > > > So this new version provides controls of dmb_type and dmb_copy to suit >> > > > > > different scenarios. >> > > > > > - Some minor changes and comments improvements. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > RFC->old version([1]): >> > > > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1702214654-32069-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >> > > > > > - Patch #1: improve the loopback-ism dump, it shows as follows now: >> > > > > > # smcd d >> > > > > > FID Type PCI-ID PCHID InUse #LGs PNET-ID >> > > > > > 0000 0 loopback-ism ffff No 0 >> > > > > > - Patch #3: introduce the smc_ism_set_v2_capable() helper and set >> > > > > > smc_ism_v2_capable when ISMv2 or virtual ISM is registered, >> > > > > > regardless of whether there is already a device in smcd device list. >> > > > > > - Patch #3: loopback-ism will be added into /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/. >> > > > > > - Patch #8: introduce the runtime switch /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/active >> > > > > > to activate or deactivate the loopback-ism. >> > > > > > - Patch #9: introduce the statistics of loopback-ism by >> > > > > > /sys/devices/virtual/smc/loopback-ism/{{tx|rx}_tytes|dmbs_cnt}. >> > > > > > - Some minor changes and comments improvements. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1695568613-125057-1-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >> > > > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231219142616.80697-1-guwen@linux.alibaba.com/ >> > > > > > [3] https://github.com/goldsborough/ipc-bench >> > > > > > [4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3189e342-c38f-6076-b730-19a6efd732a5@linux.alibaba.com/ >> > > > > > [5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/238e63cd-e0e8-4fbf-852f-bc4d5bc35d5a@linux.alibaba.com/ >> > > > > > [6] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240102184633.748113-1-urezki@gmail.com/ >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Wen Gu (15): >> > > > > > net/smc: improve SMC-D device dump for virtual ISM >> > > > > > net/smc: decouple specialized struct from SMC-D DMB registration >> > > > > > net/smc: introduce virtual ISM device loopback-ism >> > > > > > net/smc: implement ID-related operations of loopback-ism >> > > > > > net/smc: implement some unsupported operations of loopback-ism >> > > > > > net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback-ism >> > > > > > net/smc: register loopback-ism into SMC-D device list >> > > > > > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism runtime switch >> > > > > > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism statistics attributes >> > > > > > net/smc: add operations to merge sndbuf with peer DMB >> > > > > > net/smc: attach or detach ghost sndbuf to peer DMB >> > > > > > net/smc: adapt cursor update when sndbuf and peer DMB are merged >> > > > > > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism DMB type control >> > > > > > net/smc: introduce loopback-ism DMB data copy control >> > > > > > net/smc: implement DMB-merged operations of loopback-ism >> > > > > > >> > > > > > drivers/s390/net/ism_drv.c | 2 +- >> > > > > > include/net/smc.h | 7 +- >> > > > > > net/smc/Kconfig | 13 + >> > > > > > net/smc/Makefile | 2 +- >> > > > > > net/smc/af_smc.c | 28 +- >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_cdc.c | 58 ++- >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_cdc.h | 1 + >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_core.c | 61 +++- >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_core.h | 1 + >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_ism.c | 71 +++- >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_ism.h | 5 + >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 718 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> > > > > > net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 88 +++++ >> > > > > > 13 files changed, 1026 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> > > > > > create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_loopback.c >> > > > > > create mode 100644 net/smc/smc_loopback.h >> > > > > > >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f >> > > > > > >> > > > > >