Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-26225-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 139.178.88.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=139.178.88.99;
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240108032117.215171-1-wangrui@loongson.cn> <ZZ2fn0scbDKBXWe5@boqun-archlinux>
 <CAHirt9iox8FGV2wrMyxwFRjab2avfOcyLKvBc9K=AqiHxqHXKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZZ38XMQw18mw2sTA@Boquns-Mac-mini.home> <CAHirt9jQSVvBF=1wc=sT9FxngeSP30P4FDpu8m0JH_0fOPSO-w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72=X3cggAn0HLMi7jVFAfypBhog=ZkPB57yfaX4ZUzT-HA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHirt9hdtGSsEofxDb0FCtcFeAw9n9LKJALz23Qdqh4n2=Ua5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANiq72n7K8LcKrs+beF2sbt1XLdr4zEhEw4xcy3yh4wgTrvYeg@mail.gmail.com> <CAAhV-H72Hbfy7n6+AFSFFOzizo0GtpzA074sgo48-W-Dt0VR+w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAhV-H72Hbfy7n6+AFSFFOzizo0GtpzA074sgo48-W-Dt0VR+w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2024 17:08:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CANiq72mEPnB7yEZvtUXAM5w0GgYmzdrM9OhioLGb_LzbAJKNOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] Rust enablement for LoongArch
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, 
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@gmail.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>, 
	=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Roy_Baron?= <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@proton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@samsung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>, rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev, 
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 4:23=E2=80=AFAM Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>=
 wrote:
>
> Thank you for your suggestion, but since this will be replaced by the
> built-in target soon, and I don't want to change the tag to make Linus
> unhappy. Let's leave it as is.

The issue is not a big deal and I appreciate that you made the effort
to enable Rust for your architecture. However, please note that we do
our best to maintain a clean formatting state for Rust code (i.e.
`rustfmt` should be run) and that people may see this in tests/CIs
that use the Make target.

I don't think Linus would mind too much, and you could point him to
this email if you want (or you could put the fix on top); but if you
really want to keep the tag as-is, then we should consider it as a fix
for this cycle, i.e. we should not wait for e.g. the next cycle for
the built-in target. Could you please send it through your tree as
soon as possible?

Cheers,
Miguel