Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:22:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:22:30 -0500 Received: from marine.sonic.net ([208.201.224.37]:13170 "HELO marine.sonic.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 28 Dec 2001 23:22:18 -0500 X-envelope-info: Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 20:21:39 -0800 From: Mike Castle To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: State of the new config & build system Message-ID: <20011229042139.GC14067@thune.mrc-home.com> Reply-To: Mike Castle Mail-Followup-To: Mike Castle , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20011228161603.B5397@havoc.gtf.org> <7850.1009589209@ocs3.intra.ocs.com.au> <20011228225803.A7801@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20011228225803.A7801@havoc.gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 10:58:03PM -0500, Legacy Fishtank wrote: > s/break/update dependencies/ > > I assumed this was blindingly obvious, but I guess not. To YOU and other kernel hackers, yes. But not to everyone. Plus, as I understand it, it will be faster to: apply a patch and rebuild with kbuild 2.5 than to: apply a patch, make dep && make bzImage. Correct? mrc -- Mike Castle dalgoda@ix.netcom.com www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen fatal ("You are in a maze of twisty compiler features, all different"); -- gcc - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/