Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:17:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:17:14 -0500 Received: from paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.15]:18888 "HELO paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:17:05 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: Davide Libenzi Subject: Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ... Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 06:16:47 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Robert Love , Linux Kernel List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20011229051712Z287139-18284+8656@vger.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Davide worte: > There's a bug fix and the use of the Time Slice Split Scheduler inside the > local CPUs schedulers. Versions from 0.46 to 0.52 are broken by the fixed > bug so testers should use this version : > > http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/mss-2.html#patches Sorry, if someone asks this before but do you think that you get some stuff out of it for 2.4.xx? Your numbers for the 8 SMP system are great. Can't wait to do some tests on my poor single 1 GHz Athlon II and soon dual Athlon MP/XP 1600+ on an MS 6501 (AMD 760MPX). Maybe my MP3/Ogg-Vorbis hiccup during dbench 32+ are solved? Currently running latest 2.4.17+preempt (do think that can be mixed with your new scheduler?). Thanks, Dieter -- Dieter N?tzel Graduate Student, Computer Science University of Hamburg Department of Computer Science @home: Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/