Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel+bounces-27173-linux.lists.archive=gmail.com@vger.kernel.org designates 2604:1380:45e3:2400::1 as permitted sender) client-ip=2604:1380:45e3:2400::1;
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:30:25 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
CC: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
	<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>, <conor.culhane@silvaco.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>, <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
	<joe@perches.com>, <linux-i3c@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
	<miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>, <zbigniew.lukwinski@linux.intel.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] dt-bindings: i3c: svc: add compatible string i3c:
 silvaco,i3c-target-v1
Message-ID: <20240116-bleach-herbicide-48d636967134@wendy>
References: <20240110175221.2335480-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
 <20240110175221.2335480-3-Frank.Li@nxp.com>
 <3c0be658-e7a6-4231-b206-86ffb47e0cb2@linaro.org>
 <ZaFbbeQrC7o2dchO@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
 <e3b9aa63-25a5-41cc-9eb7-6e7d1eacb136@linaro.org>
 <ZaFjaWCA6k+tiCSJ@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
 <ZaWLCrWJEMtFx8cR@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
 <1b628901-7f71-4c97-9a16-723912988417@linaro.org>
 <ZaXqCoCHPWER94Hh@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
 <d45e31c4-914e-4cea-a145-9775b6f516ab@linaro.org>
Precedence: bulk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tU9usgt5JDc4MslD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d45e31c4-914e-4cea-a145-9775b6f516ab@linaro.org>

--tU9usgt5JDc4MslD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:24:20AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/01/2024 03:29, Frank Li wrote:
> >>> 	Patches were accepted after discussion, what you ponit to. So I
> >>> think everyone agree on the name 'silvaco,i3c-master-v1'.
> >>> 	I plan send next version to fix auto build error. Any additional
> >>> comments about this?
> >>
> >> I still do not see how did you address Rob's comment and his point is
> >> valid. You just did not reply to it.
> >=20
> > See https://lore.kernel.org/imx/ZXCiaKfMYYShoiXK@lizhi-Precision-Tower-=
5810/
>=20
> First of all, that's not the answer to Rob's email, but some other
> thread which is 99% ignored by Rob (unless he has filters for
> "@Rob"...). Therefore no, it does not count as valid answer.
>=20
> Second, explanation does not make sense. There is no argument granting
> you exception from SoC specific compatibles.

The patch could have been applied two months ago had Frank done as
was requested (multiple times). I don't understand the resistance
towards doing so given the process has taken way way longer as a result.

--tU9usgt5JDc4MslD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZaZMsQAKCRB4tDGHoIJi
0oXjAQD+n2/ohO6suxsrwD5Ou5eVTuKiCJW4yn6SzYminXj4UQEA5Z7Y5G8MfUrU
u49KfI9asa8Tjp9X2y7YIiNSAtP1Qg0=
=nQni
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--tU9usgt5JDc4MslD--